Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie
linguistlist.org>
I would like to thank those subscribers who shared their knowledge with me and pointed me to sources on Babel-like myths. Since I received a few requests to share the answers I received, let me mention a few. Clearly, the most thorough treatment in theories to explain the present-day linguistic babble is Arno Borst, Der Turnbau von Babel: Geschichte der Meinungen �ber Ursprung und Viefalt der Sprachen und V�lker (Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1957-1963), 6 volumes. Joshua Gutman has a good article (in Hebrew) on the Greek texts that touch on the issues in Oz Le-David (FS Ben-Gurion; Jerusalem, 1964), 585-594. Pierre Swiggers, "Babel and the Confusion of Tongues," in Armin Lange, Hermann Lichtenberg, and Diethard R�mhard (eds.), Mythos im Alten Testament und seiner Umwelt: Festschrift f�r Hans-Peter M�ller zum 65 (Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1999), 182-195, provides good bibliography of later interpretations of the Babel story. Umberto Eco, The Search for the Perfect Language (Eng. tr. Fentress; Blackwell, 1995), and George Steiner, After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation (NY: OUP, 1975), both provide fascinating tours of the myth of the primordial language in later (European) cultures. For the early Jewish, Christian, and Muslim sources, the best study I have found is Milka Rubin, "The Language of Creation or the Primordial Language: A Case of Cultural Polemics in Antiquity," JJS 49 (1998), 306-333, with references to some earlier studies. Maurice Olender, "From the Langue of Adam to the Pluralism of Babel," MHR 12 (1997), 51-59, is short and provocative, but leaves a lot open. My thanks again to those who helped me, and I hope this in turn helps others. Aaron KollerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue