Editor for this issue: Renee Galvis <renee
linguistlist.org>
Lugano Conference "Argumentation in dialogic interaction" is online at http://www.lu.unisi.ch/argumentation Deadline for the submission of papers has been postponed to 1st March! Best, Sara CigadaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Issue 5 of the syntax-semantics newsletter _Snippets_ is now out. It is accessible at the web site http://www.ledonline.it/snippets/ and hard copies are on their way to those institutions that requested hard copies. The contents of Issue 5 are: 1. R. Amritavalli and Partha Protim Sarma. A case distinction between unaccusative and unergative subjects in Assamese. 2. Paolo Acquaviva and Mark Volpe. Open-class roots in closed- class contexts: a question for lexical insertion. 3. Andrew Kehler. Another problem for syntactic (and semantic) theories of VP-ellipsis. 4. Winfried Lechner. Negative islands in comparatives. 5. Sky Lee. Telicity and VN-LV vs. VN-Acc-LV. 6. Hans-Christian Schmitz and Bernhard Schr�der. On focus and VP-deletion. 7. Ed Zoerner and Brian Agbayani. A pseudogapping asymmetry. The deadline for submissions to Issue 6 is * April 15, 2002 * ------------------------------------------------------ From the SNIPPETS Editorial Statement: The aim of _Snippets_ is to publish specific remarks that motivate research or that make theoretical points germane to current work. The ideal contribution is the ideal footnote: a side remark that taken on its own is not worth lengthy development but that needs to be said. We will publish notes that contribute to the study of _syntax and semantics in generative grammar_. The notes are to be brief, self-contained and explicit. They may do any of the following things: a. point out an empirical phenomenon that goes against accepted generalizations or that shows that some aspect of a theory is problematic; b. point out unnoticed minimal pairs that fall outside the scope of any existing theory; c. point out an empirical phenomenon that confirms the predictions of a theory in an area where the theory has not been tested; d. explicitly describe technical inconsistencies in a theory or in a set of frequently adopted assumptions; e. explicitly describe unnoticed assumptions that underlie a theory or assumptions that a theory needs to be supplemented with in order to make desired predictions; f. propose an idea for a pilot experiment in language acquisition or language processing that directly bears on theoretical issues; g. call attention to little-known or forgotten literature in which issues of immediate relevance are discussed. We will solicit submissions issue by issue. A new submission deadline will be announced for each issue, and the submissions that we receive we will consider only for that issue. The submissions that we accept will be printed in the upcoming issue; none will be scheduled for a later issue. Submissions are to be a _maximum_ of 500 words (including examples), with an additional half page allowed for diagrams, tables and references. Given that we envision the submissions themselves as footnotes, _the submissions may not contain footnotes of their own_. The ideal submission is one paragraph; a submission of five lines is perfectly acceptable. _We will not consider abstracts_. We will accept electronic submissions at the address snippetsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueunimi.it Paper submissions should be sent to Caterina Donati Facolta' di Lingue Universita' di Urbino Piazza Rinascimento 7 61029 Urbino ITALY We strongly encourage electronic submissions. Electronic submissions may take the form of the text of an e-mail message, or an attached file. The attached file should be a simple text file, a Word file (Mac or Windows), or a Rich Text Format (RTF) file. All submissions must state the name and affiliation of the author(s), and a (postal or electronic) return address.