Editor for this issue: Renee Galvis <renee
linguistlist.org>
Dear linguists, I'm writing my Ph.D. thesis on evaluative language in the British (quality and popular) press. Evaluative language includes epistemic, deontic and emotive modality (i.e. modality and affect in Hunston and Thompson's 2000 sense), so I am faced with a wealth of possibly relevant literature. I was wondering whether you could help me to locate the most important literature about - the most recent developments in the analysis of the language of the news - evaluative language (modality and affect) - a sum-up of the most important arguments in favour of/against Critical Discourse Analysis - differences between the language of the ''tabloids'' and ''broadsheets'' I am NOT looking for work done on emotive langauge in the field of cognitive linguistics (i.e. concerning the categorisation/lexicalisation of emotions, Wierzbicka's semantic primitives etc), rather, I am interested in evaluative language in connection with pragmatics/text linguistics. Thank you very much for your help. I will post a summary as soon as possible. References: Hunston, S. and G. Thompson 2000. Evaluation in Text. Oxford: OUP. Subject-Language: English; Code: ENGMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Hello, I'm currently working on my PhD thesis, on lenition in the variety of English spoken in Liverpool, UK. One particularly interesting feature of the variety is that /t/ may be realised as [h], under certainly tight constrained conditions. One of these conditions is that /t/ must be word-final, and pre-pausal (e.g. what?[h], but[h]?). The issue of pre-pausality has led me to then notion of utterance-finality, and to definitions of 'utterance' in terms of the prosodic hierarchy (particularly the interaction between utterance boundaries and pauses). I was wondering if anyone knows of other phonological process (not specifically lenition process, although that would be nice!) which seem to be conditioned by the utterance, (or by the pause). Or if there is any discussion in the literature of the existence of the 'utterance' as a domain at all, and of its place in the prosodic heirarchy? I am aware of the discussion in Nespor and Vogel 1986, and in the Proceedings of LP 98 (Fujimura et. al.), but any further sources of information would be very useful. I will post a summary to the list if there is sufficient response. Thanks, Kevin Watson. Edge Hill College of Higher Education.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue