Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Bruce wrote: > This sentence (yes/no interrogative) has the rising question > intonation. The wh-interrogative, as you say, makes myriad > replies possible. The request is to supply additional > information. The intonation is that of a normal statement. It > is the "wh-word" that specifies the expected form of the > reply. It is not asking for a truth value. The yes-no > interrogative does that. Although a wh-question is not characterised with a rising intonation but a falling one like a declarative, the wh-word itself is still distinctly marked with high pitch. In my original posting I'd characterised questions with high pitch rather than rising intonation, which applies to the whole sentence. > It also appears that, beyond what may be relayed by intonation > and context, there are probably no hard-and-fast rules to > determine the pragmatic force of a particular syntactic form. And possibly no critical properties defining some sort of digital membership for the catgory of questions either! Following Rosch (1975)in her characterisation of membership in a category NOT as an all-or-none phenomenon (digital membership) but an analog one with a prototype as "clearest cases, best examples of the category", one may also characterise--perhaps reluctantly for a formalist syntactician like me practicing binarism in most of his formal representations of language--a question with a prototypical high-pitch request for information concerning the truth values of a set of propositions. Regards, Ahmad R. Lotfi, Ph. D Department of English Language Graduate School Azad University Esfahan, IRANMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue