Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Re: Linguist 12.1634 Dear colleagues, Thank you all who answered me. I'd like to answer your question that was in all your messages. Why it is important to compute the phonemic frequencies of occurrence in a language? Every language has this or that unigue sound picture. One can intuitively feel that language A is different from language B hearing the sound picture of a language. The phonemic frequencies of occurrence create this or that sound mosaic of a language. We can compare world languages with each other after we obtain the sound picture of every world language. Now linguists believe that there are about 4000 or 5000 languages in the world. However, unfortunately, there are only 120 data on phonemeic frequency of occurrence I that I could collect for world languages. Recently there was a discussion what the corpus linguistics is. I noticed that many linguists understand it in a narrow way: just as corpus lexicology, rather than corpus linguistics. I propose to consider corpus phonetics as a part of corpus linguistics. By corpus phonetics I mean the part of corpus linguistics which studies phonetical features that become transparent when the text in some language is long enough. I have computed many long texts in different languages. It allowed me to obtain some interesting typological results on the one hand and corpus results on the other hand. If the text is not long enough, one can't obtain corpus phonetics results. I'd like the colleagues in the field of corpus linguistics to share their ideas if one should include corpus phonetics in corpus linguistics or if corpus linguistics should include only corpus lexicology and corpus syntax? If not, how should long transcription texts be called? Looking forward to your answers. Yours sincerely, Yuri Tambovtsev Novosibirsk Ped.University, RussiaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue