Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
There are examples where epenthetic copy vowels show 'overapplication' of a phonological process. For example, Winnebago normally nasalizes vowels after a nasal consonant as in [wanIk] 'bird' (capital = nasalized vowel). Winnebago also inserts a copy vowel into obstruent + sonorant clusters. In these cases, the copy vowel will undergo nasalization if the original vowel does, even though the copy vowel is not on the surface in a position where nasalization is expected: /kank/ -> [kAnAk] 'marry'. I am looking for more examples of overapplication as well as examples of 2 other possible behaviors of copy vowels: 1. Cases where a copy vowel and original vowel end up different due to normal, contextual variation. For example, where different allophones of the same vowel show up in the original and copy, or where one only one vowel undergoes some process such as ablaut. 2. Cases where both the original vowel and copy vowel undergo a process that only the COPY is in the normal position for. This is part of a project to study subtypes of copy vowel epenthesis. I will post a summary of responses. Thank you, Nancy Hall nancyhMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelinguist.umass.edu University of Massachusetts-Amherst