Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
I am an undergraduate student at Brigham Young University majoring in Linguistics. For part of my Honors thesis, I have decided to study the meaning of the word 'literal,' because it is a word that seems to be used often in linguistic literature and textbooks, but is rarely completely defined. I have conducted a statistical analysis on examples polled from the internet using Google as the search engine. Although this analysis is mainly focused on the current uses of the word 'literal' in mainstream language use, I am also very interested in the uses of the word in the linguistic academic setting. If you know of any paper or discussion addressing this topic, I would be very interested in it. More importantly, however, I am interested in getting the opinions of linguists. I would like to know if the word 'literal' is considered a problem word in academic circles, what its meaning is commonly held to be, and any opinions linguists might have on the use of the word. At the end of my paper, I hope to make some statements on how mainstream uses of the word affect its academic uses, but I would like to get a clearer picture of what effects they are having right now. Any other feedback, encouragement, criticism, or advice would be welcome. I will post a summary of the responses. And I will also post my conclusions in my paper at the end of the study. Thank you! Sarah StevensMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Does anyone know what fonts are used and the sizes in copy books for teaching primary school EFL learners to print English letters and words. Thank you!Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue