Editor for this issue: Karolina Owczarzak <karolina
linguistlist.org>
Institution: University of Durham Program: Graduate English Department Diss Status: Completed Degree Date: 1993 Author: Margaret J-M Sonmez Diss Title: English Spelling in the Seventeenth Century. A study of standardisation as seen through the MS and printed versions of the Duke of Newcastle's "A New Method . . ." Linguistic Field: Historical Linguistics, History of Linguistics, Text/Corpus Linguistics Subject Language: English Diss Director: Ann Squires Diss Abstract: This thesis investigates 17th century English spelling from the points of view of variation and standardisation. Following a survey of both contemporary and present-day commentaries on Early Modern English spelling, the linguistic nature and social contexts of the standardisation of written English are examined. In accordance with Milroy 1992's research, it is found that this process may usefully be studied as a form of language change. Unlike this earlier study, however, it is postulated that the standardisation of spelling itself (rather than of speech) will show patterns in variation that are similar to those found in the spoken language where change is in progress. The comparative analysis of the spellings of manuscript and printed versions of the first Duke of Newcastle's English book on horsemanship shows variation at a number of different textual and linguistic levels, conforming to sociolinguistic theories of variation patterning in accordance with formality. This is the first attempt to examine such spelling variation extensively, using methods other than phoneme-grapheme mapping. The analyses provide specific and numerically-substantiated information about 17th century spelling. They also show that the process of spelling standardisation demonstrates the patterns of structured variation that have been associated by sociolinguists with change towards an acknowledged prestige. Three appendices provide a complete word list of all spellings found in manuscript and printed texts, with numerical occurrences, a list of uncanonical verbal endings found in the texts, and a full, diplomatic transcription of the manuscripts used in the analyses.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue