Editor for this issue: Richard John Harvey <richard
linguistlist.org>
Please take a moment to read this message from Andrew Carnie *********************************************************************** ********************* *** ONLY $1160.43 *** ********************* Dear LINGUIST Subscribers, I know you all have heard this tune many times during the past few weeks of fund drive, and are sick of hearing about how wonderful the List is, and what a valuable resource it is, etc. etc. But then I have to ask why it is that some of you *still* haven't contributed to the List. So I thought I might add my voice to the chorus, and pipe in with the view of a former insider from the LINGUIST List world. Here's a small confession: Before I joined the LINGUIST team in 1996, I too never contributed. I had a myriad of excuses. First I was a student and couldn't contribute much -- I'd contribute later when I was fully employed. Well this wasn't exactly true; I could have contributed $5 without any serious damage to my budget. When I first got a job, I was no more inclined to contribute. On one hand, I thought others would take care of it, and second I kept thinking "It's just an email list, why do they need money to run it?" I got quite a shock when I was invited to join the LINGUIST team, first as review editor and then later as a co-moderator. Running the List is like running a small, occasionally chaotic, business. The moderators of the list don't just sit around deciding what messages to post (although that, in itself is a full time job). They direct a staff of 23 editors and programmers. They are relentless LINGUIST-promoters. They have taught themselves the intricacies of web design and Oracle database management. They patiently deal with irate subscribers. They decide policy on everything from the length of the subject line to questions of whether posting a message on the state of linguists in Israel is a political or linguistic message. They negotiate with publishers. They write development grants. They deal with administrators at their universities who don't understand what LINGUIST is. They host great LINGUIST parties. They deal with technical support problems that are beyond the ken of mere mortals (I was actually worried about Helen's health when the new webpages were being developed). And ... they do it for free! At a number of recent conferences, people have come up to me looking for the dirt and asking "So... why did you quit the LINGUIST list?". Clearly they have in mind a schism, a fight, or a brouhaha. I like to tease these people with tales of intrigue and horror, but the truth is quite mundane: The amount of work required of a LINGUIST team member was simply overwhelming and I was having to neglect my first love, syntax, to do it. I'm a big boy and generally an overachiever; but to be honest, I couldn't hack it. The job is too big. And then there are the editors, who your money *does* support. This letter would go on forever if I tried to list each of them and the fabulous work they do, but I would like to mention one. Many of you don't know it, but Karen Milligan is the star who keeps the whole list running. Helen and Tony have come to rely on her as on no editor before her. Her judgment, tact and skill continue to amaze me. Without Karen and the other student editors, I can promise you, the list would *NOT* exist. But that's what will happen if you don't contribute. These students don't receive anything resembling a prince's wage; but they work so hard on tasks that make our lives easier. Did you know that when the decision was made to switch to an Oracle data-base structure for the website, the LINGUIST editors didn't just have to keep up on their duties managing the listserv and the previous website (which was manually generated), they had to go back and re-code all the previous years of LINGUIST postings with oracle database tags. They did this *BY HAND*. Because of their sacrifice, you all now have a fantastic searchable tool. In any case, let me just say that I'm ashamed I never contributed money before I got involved with the List, and now I don't miss a chance to donate. It is *YOUR* responsibility (yes, I'm talking directly to YOU, a reader of this list) to keep this fantastic resource above ground. If you have ever applied for a job that you read about on the List, have had your book or dissertation announced or reviewed on the List, have gone to a conference because you've seen a call for papers on the List, have sat and fumed over someone's comments in a List discussion, or have searched the website looking for a journal's home page or another linguist's email, then you OWE the list your contribution, even a small one. There are no linguists who are exempt and *everyone* should contribute. (And finally, if that isn't enough, if enough of you donate, they'll stop posting these annoying calls for money... at least until next year.) Sincerely, Andrew ************************************************************************ Please Donate Today: http://linguistlist.org/donate.html For information on how to donate, please visit: http://linguistlist.org/donation.html Only $1160.43 until we reach our target of $50,000 - If only 232 people made a donation of $5 each, we'd be there... Thank you for your support.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue