Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Re Linguist 14.1264 A program called ''La parole : une histoire de FOX P2'' (Speech: A story of FOX P2) on the genetics of language, was aired on May 4th on a science program (D�couverte), by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (French) I did see the programme. Immediatly following, there was a movie called "L'�volution de l'esp�ce" (the evolution of the specie) on the evolution of different of pre-human species. When they presented Neandethal, they insisted on the fact that they could speak and, therefore, recount, for instance, their first encounter with Homo Sapiens. Following the movie, Radio-Canada aired the making of of the movie in which the athropologist who discovered Lucie was involved. He was saying that since they were physically capable of modulating sounds, having a larynx and a bucal cavity not that remote from ours, Neandethal was, therefore, able to speak. In the Radio Canada programme on FOX P2, it was clearly stated that neander- thal did not have the FOX-P2 gene and, therefore, like chimps and other monkeys, could not have language. Anyone would care to comment on this contradiction? Is the physical abillity to speak enough in order to have Language or is there a need for a specific gene? Thanks to all! Alain TheriaultMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue