Editor for this issue: Karolina Owczarzak <karolina
linguistlist.org>
New Dissertation Abstract Institution: University of Melbourne Program: Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 2002 Author: Tania E. Strahan Dissertation Title: Long-distance reflexives in Norwegian Linguistic Field: Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics Subject Language: Norwegian, Nynorsk (code: 4586) Dissertation Director 1: Lesley Stirling Dissertation Director 2: Nicholas Evans Dissertation Abstract: Despite the work of linguists such as Thrainsson, Sigur�sson, Pollard, Sag, Popowich and Kuno, among others, the analysis and explanation of long-distance reflexives (LDRs) continues to be carried out primarily in the field of syntax. A major goal of this thesis is to show that, in Norwegian, both reflexives with local antecedents and reflexives with non-local antecedents obey the same general constraints. These constraints are based upon a confluence of factors including the semantic features of reflexives as opposed to pronouns, syntactic features such as clause structure, prosodic features such as intonation, discourse features such as perspective and pragmatic information such as conversational implicature. A review of the literature on long-distance reflexives reveals several problems with syntactic approaches, the greatest problem being that they are based upon typological tendencies. Because of this, there are exceptions to nearly every analysis. The notions of finite tense, perspective, factivity and logophoricity are relevant to the description and generation of long-distance reflexives in Norwegian, but not exhaustively so. A major contribution of this thesis to the body of literature available on long-distance reflexives is the presentation of new data. Grammaticality judgements were collected from 180 native speakers of Norwegian on sentence frames which are often used as the basis for arguments in the LDR literature. In addition, 27 speakers completed an oral elicitation exercise, where 6 speakers used LDR. Despite the fact that people disagree on the level of acceptability an LDR construction has, this disagreement is regular, and describable in terms of the Extended Reference Point Proposal, which incorporates information derived from semantics, syntax, prosody, discourse and pragmatics.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue