Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie
linguistlist.org>
Workshop on MT Evaluation Towards Systematizing MT Evaluation (deadline extended!) Theme: Estimating the quality of any machine-translation system accurately is only possible if the evaluation methodology is robust and systematic. The NSF and EU-funded ISLE project has created a taxonomy that relates situations and measures for a variety of MT applications. The "Framework for MT Evaluation in ISLE" (FEMTI) is now available online at http://www.issco.unige.ch/projects/isle/taxonomy3/. The effort of matching these measures correctly with their appropriate evaluation tasks, however, is an area that needs further attention. For example, what effect do "user needs" have on the "functionality characteristics" specified in the FEMTI guidelines? To what extent are there unseen relationships in the branches of the taxonomy? How can we judge when a given evaluation measure is appropriate? Issues that come to bear on this question are the automation of MT evaluation, the extension to MT applications such as automated speech-translation, and the evaluation of the very training corpora that an MT system relies on to improve output quality. This workshop welcomes papers for 30-minute presentations on the comparison between MT evaluation measures, studies of the behavior of individual measures (i.e., meta-evaluation), new uses for measures, analysis of MT evaluation tasks with respect to measures, and related topics on this theme. We solicit submissions to the workshop that address some of the following issues, however any other topic related to MT Testing and Evaluation is also acceptable: Machine Translation Evaluation Measures: a.. Use of existing measures in the ISLE hierarchy (FEMTI guidelines) b.. New measures and their uses c.. Matching evaluation requirements (e.g., translation tasks, user profiles) with measures d.. Effects of combining measures Evaluation Measures and Languages: a.. Is a metric's effectiveness language independent? b.. Counting grammatical features for evaluation Evaluation and Domains a.. Measures for spoken Language translation b.. Domain-specific evaluation techniques c.. Using measures to evaluate the quality of a training corpus for a given task Automation vs. Human Testing a.. Which measures are suitable for automation? b.. Human/machine scoring comparisons c.. Human tester agreement: which measures fare best? Submission Format Papers (full papers up to 8 pages in length) must be submitted electronically to: barrettMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesemanticdatasystems.com, or andrei.popescu-belis
issco.unige.ch Papers are preferred in .pdf, .ps, .rtf, or .txt, format Important Dates: NEW Paper submission deadline: May 26 Notification: June 30 Camera-ready due: July 31 Note: the workshop will be held on September 23, 2003 Also see workshop website for updates: http://www.issco.unige.ch/projects/isle/MTE-at-MTS9.html Contacts Leslie Barrett (Transclick, Inc., New York, NY) Andrei Popescu-Belis (ISSCO/TIM/ETI, University of Geneva) Organizers Leslie Barrett (Transclick, Inc., New York, NY) Maghi King (ISSCO/TIM/ETI, University of Geneva) Keith Miller (MITRE Corp) Andrei Popescu-Belis (ISSCO/TIM/ETI, University of Geneva) Program Committee: Bonnie Dorr (University of Maryland) Eduard Hovy (Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California) Maghi King (ISSCO/TIM/ETI, University of Geneva) Bente Maegaard (Center for Sprogteknologi, Copenhagen, Denmark) Keith Miller (MITRE Corp.) Martha Palmer (University of Pennsylvania) Ted Petersen (Univesity of Minnesota) Andrei Popescu-Belis (ISSCO/TIM/ETI, University of Geneva) Florence Reeder (MITRE Corp) Nancy Underwood (ISSCO/TIM/ETI, University of Geneva) Michelle Vanni (National Computer Security Center)
18th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop Short Title: CGSW 18 Date: 18-SEP-03 - 20-SEP-03 Location: Durham, United Kingdom Contact: Anders Holmberg Contact Email: anders.holmbergMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuedurham.ac.uk Linguistic Sub-field: Syntax Call Deadline: 31-May-2003 Meeting Description: Workshop on comparative Germanic syntax, including diachronic syntax and language acquisition. **Second Call for Papers** Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop 18 University of Durham, 18-20 September 2003 Papers are invited for the CGSW 18, to be held in Durham, England, 18-20 September 2003. Invited speakers: Ian Roberts (Cambridge) Manuela Sch�nenberger (Konstanz) Halldor A. Sigurdsson (Lund) Peter Svenonius (Tromsoe) Susan Wurmbrand (McGill) The workshop will take place in St. John's College, University of Durham. There is no conference fee, but participants pay their own costs. Accommodation at a reasonable rate is provided at the college: 40 GBP/night for full board. The workshop will start in the evening of the 18th and end at 4pm the 20 September. Papers (45 minutes inclusive) may concern any aspect of comparative Germanic syntax, including diachronic syntax and language acquisition. Abstracts (maximum 2 pages single spaced, 12 point, 2.5 cm. margins) to be sent to Anders Holmberg School of Linguistics and Language University of Durham Elvet Riverside Durham DH1 3JT UK Abstracts may be sent electronically (Word or pdf) to anders.holmberg
durham.ac.uk Deadline for abstracts: 31 May. Results of the selection of papers will be announced three weeks later.