LINGUIST List 14.1364

Mon May 12 2003

Qs: Semantic Restrictions

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <foxlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  1. Seth Minkoff, Semantic restrictions on passive or other "voices"

Message 1: Semantic restrictions on passive or other "voices"

Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:51:14 +0000
From: Seth Minkoff <seth.minkoffumb.edu>
Subject: Semantic restrictions on passive or other "voices"

Dear Linguist readers:

I am looking for any references on literature dealing with semantic
restrictions on passive, dative shift, antipassive, or other ''voice
alternations'' (in any language): for example, works addressing the
unacceptability of sentences like (1) - (2).

(1) *Mary was resembled by Sally. (cf. Sally resembled Mary.)
(2) *Mary sent the store Sally. (cf. Mary sent Sally to the store.)

I will post a summary of responses. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Seth A. Minkoff
Hispanic Studies
UMass-Boston
seth.minkoffumb.edu 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue