Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
Folks, I am looking for histories of fieldwork in different parts of the world, e.g. when it began, by whom, what the motivations were, how it has developed since, and its current status. This is not an exhaustive list and I know that different accounts will only tell bits of the whole story. I am interested in either personal or general accounts. If there is a book, journal, or article that you value highly as a good resource on the history of fieldwork, I would very much appreciate hearing from you at my Manchester email address. If there are sufficient responses, I will post a summary. Thanks much, Dan EverettMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I am a linguistics student currently looking at accounts to non-configurational languages like Walpiri. Non-configurational languages tend to exhibit a number of properties (e.g.: pronominal agreement markers, overt case marking of DPs, lack of pleonastic subjects, discontinuous DPs) which seem to be related to their (mostly) free-word order (note below). I have been looking at GB/ minimalist approaches (e.g.: Hale 1983, Jelinek 1984, Legate 2002, Pensalfini In Press), as well as LFG accounts (e.g. Nordlinger, 1998), which mainly (in a very simplified description of these accounts) explore the possibility of having the overt DPs which seem to be arguments being adjuncts (thus freely ordered), while either pro or pronominal markers occupy the argument positions. I would like to know if anyone is aware of a categorical grammar approach to the question or any other literature which may be interesting or add to the approaches I mentioned. I will post the results of my query later. Thank you, Ananda Lima Note: this is not directly concerned with scrambling languages like Japanese, where there is relatively free word order, but where the order seems to be more clearly derived from a base order.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue