Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
A. S. Sundar rightly points out that the most critical group in saving an endangered language is the native speakers but wrongly concludes that linguists have little role. There are so many pressure on endangered languages that it is unrealistic to think that every group will be able to withstand them. I have seen so many instances when even simple recordings of a language have been of immense value to the heritage community that I continue to believe that linguists are doing great deeds when they document languages. Often, even the heritage community does not recognize the value of the language until after it is gone, and it may be at that point that the disinterested (or, to critics, self-interested) linguist becomes the keeper of the flame. (The Endangered Language Fund sponsored one master-apprentice program last year in which the only master left was, in fact, the linguist who had worked with the apprentice's grandmother.) So it is certainly the case that linguists have a secondary role in the fight to save endangered languages, but their role is still important. Doug Whalen DhW President, Endangered Language Fund http://www.ling.yale.edu/~elf/ - Doug Whalen (whalenMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehaskins.yale.edu) Haskins Laboratories 270 Crown St. New Haven, CT 06511 http://www.haskins.yale.edu/