Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
In response to Michael Newman (Linguist 14.1809): France also contains a number of highly endangered languages, which are victims of its singularly effective policies of linguistic homogenization. At the same time, it is, being France, particularly sensitive to its intellectual reputation.) Yes, I think France would be sensitive to international academic pressure. My feeling (having been involved with Breton now for the best part of 30 years) is that the general French public is no longer antagonistic to the lesser-used languages of France, but most of the political elite lag well behind public opinion, and remain vehemently opposed to any promotion of regional languages. The same officials who appropriate large sums of French public money to support moribund French-speaking pockets in the US oppose the provision of funding for regional languages spoken natively by French citizens on the grounds that such support would be "ethno-communitarian" "identity-based" and hence "anti-republican". In France, it's simple: when you are in favour cultural difference, you call it "universalisme" and "l'exception culturelle fran�aise"; when you are against, you call it "le ghetto culturel" and "le repli identitaire". French linguists, on the whole, do not appear to be very concerned about changing their country's abysmal record on this score. Steve Hewitt Paris, FranceMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue