Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie
linguistlist.org>
Computer Treatment of Slavonic Languages Short Title: SLOVKO 2003 Date: 24-Oct-2003 - 25-Oct-2003 Location: Bratislava, Slovakia Contact: Vladim�r Benko Contact Email: BenkoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefedu.uniba.sk Meeting URL: http://www.fedu.uniba.sk/slovko03 Linguistic Sub-field: General Linguistics Subject Language Family: Slavic Subgroup Meeting Description: Deadline for registrations: July 21, 2003 The seminar will provide a meeting point for people working on various aspects of the relationship between languages and computers. With this broad thematic framework in mind, papers are invited describing activities concerning any Slavonic language, as well as those dealing with bi- and multi-lingual projects involving at least one Slavonic language. The topics may include -- but are not limited to: - Tools for linguistic text analysis - Creation and use of language resources - Linguistic components of information systems - Speech analysis and synthesis - Computer-aided translation, localization and lexicography - Computer-aided language learning The papers may be presented in any Slavonic language as well as in English. Please note, however, that no interpretation will be available.
Argument realization - Conceptual and grammatical factors Date: 25-Feb-2004 - 27-Feb-2004 Location: Mainz, Germany Contact: Heike Tappe Contact Email: heike.tappeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuerz.hu-berlin.de Meeting URL: http://www.uni-mainz.de/dgfs2004/ Linguistic Sub-field: General Linguistics Call Deadline: 15-Aug-2003 Meeting Description: Workshop held during the 26. Annual Meeting of the German Society of Linguistics(DGfS) 2004 in Mainz (Germany), February 25-27 ARGUMENT REALIZATION - CONCEPTUAL AND GRAMMATICAL FACTORS Call for papers We invite abstracts for presentations at a workshop held during the 26. Annual Meeting of the German Society of Linguistics (DGfS)in Mainz 2004, February 25-27. Time slots for presentation are 30 (20+10) minutes. We welcome submissions for presentations in German or in English. CALL DEADLINE 15-AUG-2003 Workshop description: Verbs exhibit considerable intra-linguistic and inter-linguistic variation in the realization of their arguments. This phenomenon is crucial for investigating the interaction between conceptual representations and genuinely linguistic structures. While the factors underlying argument alternations used to be of primary interest to lexical semantic researchers, we recently find a growing number of syntactic analyses. Here, the semantic decomposition of lexical entities is transferred to syntax and consequently different syntactic heads are held responsible for the varied thematic and event structural interpretations of arguments. Lexical semantics assumes that argument realization and the possible range of diatheses can be derived from a verbs basic lexical entry. The underlying assumption that conceptually motivates this perspective is the iconicity of language hypothesis: The unmarked, morphologically simple verb form corresponds to the unmarked concept. Language specific variation occurs due to varying grammatical parametrizations. In contrast, syntactic analyses propose that meaning aspects which are traditionally accounted for by the basic entry emerge from syntactic structure building (e.g., Kratzer 1996, Marantz 1997, Borer 1998). Such approaches bear the danger of duplicating conceptual information that is already lexically represented. This problem can be circumvented, if lexical entries are instead associated with poor concepts, which have to be enriched in syntax. It follows that the degree of morphological complexity can reflect argument alternating operations only in those cases where lexically determined information is enriched (e.g. causativation). Yet, morphologically encoded operations leading to argument reduction cannot be accounted for in a straightforward way. An alternative is proposed by Reinhart (2000) in her conception of the theta-system. Here, lexical entries are allotted more theta-roles that a single verb diathesis can contain. Syntactic principles function as filters restricting the possible argument realizations. This means, that lexical entries are associated with very rich concepts, from which smaller units are extracted in syntax. It is the aim of this workshop to bring together current approaches from different theoretical frameworks in order to critically discuss the consequences of the respective analyses for linguistic theory. We are especially interested in the question what kind of evidence from typological and empirical investigations may contribute to an evaluation of theoretical proposals. Phenomena of interest are all kinds of constructions in which greater morphosyntactic complexity does not correspond to greater conceptual complexity. References Borer, H. (1998) Deriving passives without theta roles. In: S. Lapointe et al. (eds.) Morphology and Its Relation to Syntax. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 60-99. Kratzer, A. (1996) Severing the external argument from its verb. In: J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds.) Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109-137. Marantz, A. (1997) No escape from syntax: Dont try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In: U.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2, 201-225. Reinhart, T. (2000). The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics 00,01/TL, Utrecht institute of Linguistics OTS. IMPORTANT DEADLINES Submission of abstracts: August 15th, 2003 Notification of acceptance: September 30th, 2003 Please submit abstracts via e-mail (MS-Word or pdf) to the following address: heike.tappe
rz.hu-berlin.de Heike Tappe Humboldt University Berlin English and American Studies (Linguistics) Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin heike.tappe
rz.hu-berlin.de Ingrid Kaufmann University D�sseldorf Institut for Language & Information Universit�tsstr. 1, 40225 D�sseldorf kaufmann
phil-fak.uni-d�sseldorf.de