Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
Institution: University of Arizona Program: Second Language Acquisition and Teaching Program Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 2003 Author: Enchao Shi Dissertation Title: Second Language Grammar and Secondary Predication Linguistic Field: Language Acquisition Subject Language: English (code: ENG) Dissertation Director 1: Andrew Barss Dissertation Director 2: Douglas Adamson Dissertation Abstract: This thesis presents empirical evidence for second language grammar or the final L2 state. Following the minimalist spirit and the Continuity Hypothesis, we propose that L2 grammar or G2 is essentially non-distinct from the native final state (G1) (cf. Flynn and Lust 2002). Several assumptions are critical to the study, one of which is that grammatical theory is not deducible from analysis of developmental data (cf. Chomsky 1985, 1999). A second assumption is that the characterization of the initial L2 state is a matter of logic, not merely a developmental issue. Another assumption is that competence is inaccessible to analysis (cf. Chomsky 1988, Moravcsik 1998); extra care is warranted to avoid research artifacts We propose that G2 constitutes two components: a Computational system and a lexicon, and G1 is external to the formation of G2. As such, we argue that UG constitutes the initial L2 state and the development of an L2 lexicon proceeds primarily independent of G1, a hypothesis we called the CHL2 Uniformity Hypothesis (CUH). However, we propose that L2 development is sometime mediated by the Interpretation Device (ID), which translates L2 sensory data into an L1 for comprehension. The ID is a processing mechanism and its use is constrained by the Relativized Transfer Condition (RTC), an acquisition procedure. Given that the ID is largely not amendable to analysis, we put the RTC to test. We also wanted to find out whether adult L2 learners are conservative. The experiments focused on the English resultatives (Mary painted the house red) and depictives (John ate the meat raw) - the former but not the latter is available in Mandarin. Nineteen Mandarin speakers of English and nineteen native speakers of English participated. The L2 subjects had lived in the United States for an average of 10 years and 5 months. Four tests were administered: the Guided Production (GP) test, the Clause-combining (CC) test, the Grammaticality Judgment (GJ) test, and the Interpretation (IT) test. Results, derived via application of t-test, one-way ANOVA, and factorial ANOVA, are of significance. L2 subjects showed knowledge of resultatives and depictives on a par with the controls on most tests. L2 subjects nonetheless produced fewer resultatives and depictives than the controls on the GP test, but no difference has been found with the canonical constructions. We attribute such irregularities to the modalities of measurements and functions of RTC, because between-group differences were drastically reduced to insignificance on the other tests (CC, GJ, and IT tests), where choices for constructions were directed to resultatives and depictives. This result indicates that the final L2 state coincides with that of the native speakers; hence evidence for the CUH. This result also led us to a logical conjecture that the linguistic and learning mechanisms that lead to the final L2 state must be the same as those employed by the native speakers, a result compatible with the Continuity Hypothesis. Furthermore, the study shows that the RTC constrains adult L2 development, since L2 knowledge was indeed affected by the linguistic canonicality. Finally, we conclude that adult L2 learners are relatively conservative.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue