Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Re: Llinguist 14.1837 and Linguist 14.1864 I am not a member of this list but several people have been kind enough to forward the messages posted about my study. Several misconceptions seem to have been perpetuated, probably as this has all come via news reports. I need to emphasize that the BBC story was based on a press release, and does not represent a piece of scientific writing, nor indeed does it represent the emphasis of the original work. This press release concerned an Exhibit I had at the Royal Society Summer Science exhibition, and the study with Mandarin speakers featured as part of this. The study was one of the neural basis of the perceptual processing of Mandarin, a topic which I have been studying in English for some time. We found that listening to intelligible Mandarin (contrasted with an acoustically matched but unintelligible baseline) results in the activation of both left and right superior temporal sulci. English speakers listening to English activate the left superior temporal sulcus in an analogous contrast. The results survive a direct statistical comparison. We studied Mandarin speakers from China as the long term goal is to do a study of bilingual Mandarin/English speakers in Singapore. To do this we needed some idea of what activation is seen in non bilingual Mandarin speakers. This study was not intended to represent a single comprehensive study of tonal lanuages, and indeed several other researchers (Jack Gandour, Robert Zatorre) have looked into other aspects of processing in tonal languages. The 'interpretation' of these results with respect to 'difficulty' is just that - a piece of journalistic intrepretation. It is certainly not the point of the study. very best wishes Sophie Scott reply to: sophie.scottMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueucl.ac.uk