Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
See a review of the article in Le Figaro of 9 July 2003: http://www.lefigaro.fr/cgi/edition/genimprime?cle=20030709.FIG0242 Best, Steve HewittMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Larry Trask wonders why this paper was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, a journal not commonly read by historical linguists. I suggest that there are two reasons. The first is that since it is unlikely that any linguistics journal would publish such tripe, the authors had to find a journal that was either unrefereed (as PNAS used to be) or that is unlikely to use referees with competance in the relevant area. The second is that publishing in a "science" journal gives the false impression that the work is necessarily of good quality. - Bill Poser, Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wjposer/ billposerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuealum.mit.edu