Editor for this issue: Tomoko Okuno <tomoko
linguistlist.org>
Institution: Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Program: Centre for Russian, Central Asian and East European Studies Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 2003 Author: Alok Kumar Das Dissertation Title: A Study of Languages in Russian Federation Linguistic Field: Sociolinguistics Dissertation Director 1: Zafar Imam Dissertation Abstract: This is as much a study on the languages of the Russian Federation, in particular, as on the sociology of language, in general. For, multilingualism, as such, is in many respects the foundation field out of which the sociology of language grows and ramifies. One of the important issues that has come on the scene as a result of the disintegration of the Soviet Union is the linguistic cauldron in New Russia affecting its multilingual configuration. Although, the erstwhile USSR was also a multinational state, the issue of language and various problems emanating from it assumed a novel importance in New Russia. This study is an endeavour to present the complex linguistic scenario of Russia in its contemporary socio-political set up, as well as to address the issues that usually come up, for that matter, in any multilingual/ bilingual environment. Through this study, we have tried to put forth concept, information and suggestion for the construction of as yet an unrealised, and admittedly distant, general theory or model or typology, which should give fuller understanding of the complex conjunctions of variables affecting the over-all language situation in the Russian Federation. All in all, it presents a profile of this linguistic issue with the hope to make a significant contribution to the development of a more 'reflexively aware' and 'culturally focussed' field of language study. A systematic chapter framework, consisting six chapters, has been followed. Language is historical memory of people, whether in India, Russia or elsewhere. Depicting more or less realistically the present, it ties it up with the mastered past and the desirable future. Language situation in Russia today is therefore a product of the policies put in place in years past. The processes of language policy and its planning carried on since 1991 in the Russian Federation has been explained with a short reference to the historical, political and social outcomes raised by the nationality and language policies implemented during decades in the former USSR. Chapter I, The Soviet Legacy, deal primarily with sociolinguistic background, in which the language policies right from the Tsarist period up to the disintegration of the former USSR have been discussed. Language legislation, right through, had a close bearing on the language situation, in general, and on linguistic pluralism and syncretism, in particular. It also critically analyses policy anomalies in the Soviet period, and the role of oscillating language ideologies over the years in constructing perceptions of social, ethnic and national difference. The construction of this whole thesis is made on the foundation of this legacy. The disintegration of the USSR was one of the most unprecedented events of our times. It has impelling impacts on the sociolinguistic and socio-economic situation of Russia. Chapter II deals with this impact on language distribution and language maintenance in the Russian Federation. Massive changes in the population structure of Russia after 1991, together with factors other than population movement, such as the social ones, have added a new dimension to the already existing sociolinguistic complexity. The ethnic experience in a modern society provides insight into the rich diversity of human experience. And language is considered to be a depository and a chronicle of the ethnos. Likewise, the viability and continuity of the language are almost necessary conditions for the continuity of the ethnic groups as such. Chapter III tries to put facts on file as far as the present language-distribution in the Russian Federation is concerned, with due consideration to the ethnolinguistic factor affecting the same.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue