Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie
linguistlist.org>
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication Call Deadline: 01-Dec-2003 A special issue of the Journal of Asian Pacific Communication (JAPC) will be devoted to the topic ''Standard modern Chinese (Mandarin/Putonghua) and its varieties in a multilingual Chinese society''. In the past half-century's promotion of the standard modern Chinese, varieties of the standard language have arisen. It is well known to linguists and the public that there are ''Shanghai Putonghua'', ''Guangzhou Putonghua'', ''Zhuang Putonghua'', ''Taiwan Guoyu'', etc. Amid China's rapid modernization drive, more and more people have been speaking the ''standard'' language and have been more and more affected by their standard language ability in their daily communication and socio-economic advancement. Thus, we believe that a systematic study of standard modern Chinese and its varieties is now more warranted than ever. A paper may address one of the questions below, a combination of these questions or more important questions not raised above as well as the theoretical significance of the Chinese case to any multilingual society that engages in status planning. The focus of this special issue is on standard modern Chinese and its varieties in the PRC, but papers on the topic in other Chinese speaking societies will also be considered. 1. How should varieties of standard modern Chinese be (linguistically) defined? 2. Are varieties of standard modern Chinese transitional/interlanguages (see C. Saillard, forthcoming) or like varieties of English (e.g. British English vs. American English, etc) and other languages (e.g. Spanish vs. Catalan, Japanese vs. Okinawan, Czech vs. Slovakian, etc.)? 3. Do the People's Republic of China's legislation and practice that recognize different levels of the standard language have any implication for theories of language (status) planning? 4. In the linguistic repertoire of a speech community may exist a more-standard version of modern Chinese, less-standard varieties of modern Chinese, and dialects/minority languages. In what domains are these three forms respectively allocated in everyday communication in such a community? 5. An individual speaker may also have these three forms of languages/varieties in his/her repertoire. How does s/he switch from one code to another in actual communication? What communicative functions do the switch and/or each of the three codes serve? 6. Early studies (J. Bai, 1994; I. Kalmer, Y. Zhong and H. Xiao, 1987) of small samples suggest different attitudes towards these three forms of languages/varieties in a speech community. What are current attitudes (of larger and more representative samples) towards these three languages/varieties in speech communities where they are all used? Submission deadlines: An abstract of 250 words is due on December 1, 2003. The complete paper is due on July 1, 2004. The editorial board will review submitted abstracts and give helpful comments to submitters in order to ensure the success of abstract submitters and the success of this special issue. Thus, abstract submission is highly encouraged, but it does not guarantee the acceptance of the complete paper nor does it exclude consideration of any submitted complete paper. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Send abstracts and complete papers to the special issue editor, Minglang Zhou (zhoumMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuedickinson.edu), in a MS word document in an attachment. The complete paper (no more than 20 double-spaced pages, including all notes and references) should follow the JAPC style and, if written by a non-native speaker of English, be proofread by a native speaker of English. The style sheet and samples are available at http://www.benjamins.com/cgi-bin/t_seriesview.cgi?series=JAPC or from the special issue editor. In the text, examples and terms may be represented in Pinyin alone if Pinyin is sufficient to show the difference or in combination of Pinyin and Chinese characters if Pinyin is not sufficient.