Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
Folks, I am interested in knowing how different institutions (in different parts of the world, ideally) evaluate linguistics publication outlets. In most tenure and promotion deliberations I am aware of in the USA, for example, linguistics is like economics, but unlike, say anthropology, history, or literary theory, in valuing articles (rather than, say, squibs) in major journals (e.g. LI, NLLT, Lg, for at least N.American theoretical linguists) over monographs, even monographs from prestigious publishers, e.g. Cambridge, Oxford, Chicago, etc. My question is this: what would a linguistics tenure/promotion committee at your institution value most from, say, a jr. syntactician, an article in NLLT, LI, or Lg or a research monograph or other type of book? Ultimately, I realize that thoughtful committees will give much more importance to their perception of the quality of the publications rather than the outlets per se, but I am interested in rules-of-thumb. If there are sufficient responses, I will post a summary. Please respond to me at: dan.everettMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueman.ac.uk
Dear colleagues I am trying to find out whether any Japanese works on Linguistics or Applied Linguistics (i.e. works of any period written in Japanese by Japanese scholars on the Japanese language) have been translated in other languages. I am particularly interested in European languages, but any other reference is welcome. Thank you barbara pizziconi SOAS, University of London Subject-Language: Japanese; Code: JPNMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue