LINGUIST List 14.2185

Mon Aug 18 2003

Qs: Chinese Lex;Turkish

Editor for this issue: Takoko Matsui <takolinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  1. Lawrence Orenstein, Chinese Lexical Semantics
  2. Kristen Sherman-Gosnell, Origin of "bomba"

Message 1: Chinese Lexical Semantics

Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:28:30 +0000
From: Lawrence Orenstein <lmoaya.yale.edu>
Subject: Chinese Lexical Semantics

I would very much appreciate it if anyone could refer me to any work
that has been done on Chinese lexical semantics. I am particularly
interested in cognitive categories in Manderin, but any references
would be of great assistance. For the moment, I am located in a rather
obscure backwater of China where I lack access to a good research
library. The attempts at a literature search here have thus far proved
to no avail.

Subject-Language: Chinese, Mandarin; Code: CHN 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Message 2: Origin of "bomba"

Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:08:49 +0000
From: Kristen Sherman-Gosnell <kshermangosnellyahoo.com>
Subject: Origin of "bomba"

I am writing concerning my inability to find the origin of the word
''bomba'' in the Turkish language. It is the root of a surname I am
researching from Sicily in the Messina provice called ''Bombaci.'' I
am trying to determine if the root ''bomba'' is of Greek, Latin, or of
Turkish origin and which of these is oldest. The surname does not
appear before 1690. Thank you for your help in this matter as it has
been a long time since my linguistics course in college!
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue