Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
Institution: University of California, San Diego Program: Linguistics Department Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 2003 Author: Michael Hughes Dissertation Title: Morphological Faithfulness to Syntactic Representations Dissertation URL: http://www.csusm.edu/mhughes/ Linguistic Field: Syntax Morphology Subject Language: Swedish (code: SWD) Icelandic (code: ICE) German, Standard (code:GER) Dissertation Director 1: David M Perlmutter Dissertation Director 2: Farrell Ackerman Dissertation Director 3: Eric Bakovic Dissertation Director 4: Sharon Rose Dissertation Abstract: This dissertation examines the nature of the syntax-morphology interface by looking at the phenomenon of Concord within the Noun Phrase in three Germanic languages (Swedish, Icelandic, and German). We argue that the Elsewhere Condition, which constitutes the basis of the syntax-morphology interface in a number of theories, is unable to account for several alternations in determiner and adjective inflection found in these languages. We advocate an approach to the interface in which syntactic terminal nodes and inflected words are separate theoretical objects in association with each other. Terminal nodes of syntactic structures consist of bundles of morphosyntactic features. The output of the lexicon consists of inflected forms, potentially underspecified for morphosyntactic features, which compete for association with a targeted node. We show how morphological blocking effects can be modeled in Optimality Theory in terms of two constraints that enforce faithfulness of inflected forms to the morphosyntactic requirements of the containing syntactic representation. We also show, however, that in Icelandic and German it is possible for a less faithful inflected form to beat out a more faithful form under certain circumstances. As a result, we argue that the constraints that form the basis of the interface in most languages need to be augmented to account for the Germanic phenomena. In particular, Icelandic and German provide evidence for a constraint that seeks to maximize the expression of morphosyntactic features across the NP, possibly at the expense of maximal faithful expression of features associated with a given terminal node within the NP. In addition, German requires an economy constraint on the expression of morphosyntactic features within the Adjective Phrase. The proposal is able to account for a number of patterns of inflection that are unaccounted for in previous accounts.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue