Editor for this issue: Sarah Murray <sarah
linguistlist.org>
Dan's point about the role of cultural conventions is important. What we have yet to sort out properly in phonology, as well as in other branches of linguistics, is the complex interaction between capacities given by nature and the conventions adopted by different cultures. I can't see that the Chomskyan 'language is nature' position is any more sustainable than the Roy Harris 'language belongs to culture, not nature' position. I think that the study of phonology has a major role to play in adressing the nature vs culture issue, and that it can usefully add to work by people such as Tomasello in syntax and Levinson in semantics. Does Dan know anything about the acquisition of those rare sounds in those Southern American languages? I think acquisition is important for these issues. Phil _________________________ Philip Carr D�partement d'anglais Universit� Paul Val�ry (UPV) Route de Mende 34199 Montpellier FRANCE Equipe de Recherche en Syntaxe et S�mantique (ERSS) UMR 5610, CNRS, Maison de la Recherche, Universit� Toulouse-le-Mirail 31058 Toulouse FRANCEMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue