Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
A while back I posted a query (Linguist 14.1811) on the sources of the following three claims, which I believed I had read somewhere: 1. Cross-culturally polite/mitigated utterances tend to be longer (more words, longer words) than bald-on-record/unmitigated utterances. 2. Cross-culturally politeness tends to increase with greater differences in status, in particular from the lower status person to the higher status person. 3. In many cultures, the politeness/intimacy relationship follows a u-shaped curve, with greatest politeness in the middle area, with acquaintances, and less politeness with intimates and strangers. I would like to thank Maria Sifianou, Susan Burt and Jo Tyler for their helpful responses. In response to my first point, no one was able to specify a source. So if anyone reading this summary can remember reading such a claim anywhere, and can identify the source, I would still be interested in hearing from them. Mary Sifianou suggested that Brown and Levinson might have made such a claim, howver, I have gone back and looked through B&L, and have not yet found them to say anything along these lines. Susan Burt wrote: I think that this is the usual assumption, although there are some indications that this may be an antifact of research methods--written responses to DCTs (discourse completion tasks) tend to be longer than corresponding spoken responses. In addition, there seems to be some tendency for non-native speakers to produce longer utterances than native speakers. Articles you might want to look at include: Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen and Beverley S. Hartford. (1993). "Refining the DCT: Comparing Open Questionnaires and Dialogue Completion Tasks." Pragmatics and Language Learning 4, pp. 143-165. Beebe, Leslie M. and Martha Clark Cummings. (1995). "Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance." in Susan M. Gass and Joyce Neu (eds.), Speech Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, pp. 65-86. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Cohen, Andrew (1995). "Investigating the production of speech act sets." in Susan M. Gass and Joyce Neu (eds.), Speech Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, pp. 21-43. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Hartford, Beverly S. and Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig (1992). "Experimental and Observational Data in the Study of Interlanguage Pragmatics." Pragmatics and Language Learning 3, pp. 33-52. Hinkel, Eli. (1997). "Appropriateness of Advice: DCT and Multiple Choice Data." Applied Linguistics 18:1, pp. 1-26. Houck, Noel and Susan Gass. (1995). "Non-native refusals: A methodological perspective." in Susan M. Gass and Joyce Neu (eds.), Speech Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, pp. 45-64. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Johnston, Bill, Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (1998). "Effect of Rejoinders in Production Questionnaires." Applied Linguistics 19:2, pp. 157-182. Kasper, Gabriele (2000). "Data Collection in Pragmatics Research." In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. London: Continuum, pp 316-341. Kasper, Gabriele and Merete Dahl. (1991). "Research Methods in Interlanguage Pragmatics." Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, pp. 215-247. Kuha, Mai (1997). "The Computer-Assisted Interactive DCT: A Study in Pragmatics Research Methodology." Pragmatics and Language Learning 8, pp. 99-123. Rintell, Ellen M. and Candace J. Mitchell (1989). "Studying Requests and Apologies: An Inquiry into Method." in Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds.) : Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, pp. 248-272. Norowood, NJ: Ablex. Rose, Kenneth R. (1992). "Speech acts and questionnaires: The effect of hearer response." Journal of Pragmatics 17, pp. 49-62. Rose, Kenneth R. (1994). "On the Validity of Discourse Completion Tests in Non-Western Contexts." Applied Linguistics 15:1, pp. 1-14. Wolfson, Nessa, Thomas Marmor and Steve Jones. (1989) "Problems in the Comparison of Speech Acts Across Cultures." in S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper (eds.) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, pp.174-196. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. In response to my second point, both Mary Sifianou and Susan Burt pointed me back to Brown & Levinson, as having first made that claim. In response to my third point, Mary Sifianou, Susan Burt and Jo Tyler provided the following references: Nessa Wolfson (1988). The Bulge: A Theory of Speech Behavior and Social Distance. In Jonathan Fine (ed): Second Language Discourse: A Textbook of Current Research. Norwood NJ: Ablex.. pp. 21-38 Nessa Wolfson, Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL, 1989, pp. 129-139 (Heinle & Heinle) Jo Tyler also pointed out that Diana Boxer, in studying the speech act of complaints, found a different "bulge" pattern (Complaining and Comisserating, 1994, Peter Lang Publishing - Dr. Fay Wouk Senior Lecturer in Linguistics Department of Applied Language Studies and Linguistics University of Auckland Private Bag 92019 Auckland New Zealand f.woukMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueauckland.ac.nz