Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
Dear all, I am currently working on a doctoral thesis proposal concerning L2 learners' perception and processing of teachers' written feedbacks. I intended to approach it from an information-processing perspective: what in the feedback can be perceived and processed by the L2 learners? What are the factors that might affect the perception? This issue mainly involves two areas of studies, namely, that of SLA concerning feedback effect (i.e., Lyster, 1998) and that of Second Language Writing studies concerning feedback effect (i.e., Truscott, 1996). I found, however, drastic conflicts in these two areas with regard to the effect of grammar correction (corrective feedback). SLA is getting ever more optimistic about the feedback effect (F-on-F, Noticing Hypothesis, etc.), while the feedback landscape in SLW is getting dimmer and dimmer. Of course they approach it from different angles and target at different evaluation criteria, but the conflicting opinions thereof are really discouraging. Therefore I need your wit in the follow questions. (1) Do you have confidence in corrective feedback in learners' writing? (2) What do L2 learners actually do when they receive the written feedback? (wow, it is too big a question, isnt' it?) (3) What role do you think corrective feedback may play in L2 writing and SLA in general? (even bigger! Sorry.) I especially appreciate the wits and intuition from language teachers and students. Their feelings are what really matter in any classroom research. Thank you!! JudieMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue