Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie
linguistlist.org>
Graduate workshop on research designs and data analysis in L1 attrition research Date: 15-Dec-2003 - 16-Dec-2003 Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands Contact: Monika S. Schmid Contact Email: ms.schmidMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelet.vu.nl Linguistic Sub-field: Applied Linguistics Meeting Description: At this graduate workshop, research designs, data collection and analysis methods and the role of theoretical frameworks in L1 attrition research will be discussed. Participants include senior researchers and graduate students. Graduate workshop on research designs and data analysis in L1 attrition research VU Amsterdam, 15 - 16.12.2003 Contact: Monika S. Schmid Engelse Taal en Cultuur Faculteit der Letteren Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1105 1081 HV Amsterdam The Netherlands Phone: 0031-20-4446435 Fax: 0031-20-4446500 ms.schmid
let.vu.nl Participants a) Senior researchers: -Prof. Kees de Bot, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Prof. de Bot is internationally one of the leading figures in the area of language attrition, he has been conducting and supervising research on this topic since the early 1980s. -Dr. Ayse Gurel, Bogazici University Istanbul. Dr. Gurel has written her McGill-University PhD thesis on the L1 attrition of Turkish in an English-speaking environment. She is an expert on attrition within a Government-Binding approach. -Prof. Frans Hinskens, VU Amsterdam. Prof. Hinskens has expert knowledge on methodological and practical issues involved in data analysis in research on language variety and change, particularly contact-induced language change. -Dr. Barbara Koepke, Universit� de Toulouse - Le Mirail. Dr. Koepke has been studying language attrition since 1996 and is one of the international experts in the field, especially from the perspective of psycholinguistics. Her recent work on the topic includes the editorship of a special volume of the Journal of Neurolinguistics, as well as the co-organization of an international conference on methodological issues in the study of L1 attrition, together with Dr. Schmid, at the VU Amsterdam in Aug. 2002. Publication of the conference volume is anticipated in 2004 with John Benjamins, Amsterdam. -Dr. Monika S. Schmid, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Dr. Schmid has been researching language attrition since 1996. Her recent work includes a research monograph (2002, First Language Attrition, Use and Maintenance, Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins), the organisation of an international conference (s. under Dr. Köpke) and preparation of the conference volume to be published with John Benjamins in 2004, and various articles in international journals and handbooks. b) Graduate students -Emanuel Bylund, graduate student at the University of Stockholm, Sweden, investigating the tense-aspect distinction in the attrition of L1 Spanish in a Swedish environment -Susan Dostert, graduate student at the Heinrich-Heine-Universit�t D�sseldorf, Germany, working on the L1 attrition of English in Germany within the framework of the Activation Threshold Hypothesis -Chrissy Hosea, student at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, working on the fossilization of Dutch in Indonesia. -Katja J�skelainen, graduate student at the University of Vienna, Austria, investigating attitudes towards attrited Finnish in a German environment -Mathilde Jansen, graduate student at the Meertens-Institut Amsterdam, investigating social and socio-psychological factors in dialect levelling of Frisian on the islands Ameland and Terschelling. -Merel Keijzer, graduate student at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, investigating L1 Dutch in English-speaking contexts within the framework of the regression hypothesis. -Nana Leppanen, graduate student at the University of Oulu, Finland, investigating the attrition of Finnish case-marking in the US and the task-dependency, i.e. the influence of different types of elicitation techniques on subjects' performance. -Dorota Lubinska, graduate student at the University of Stockholm, Sweden, investigating the attrition of Polish in a Swedish environment from the point of view of bilingual development -Conny Opitz, graduate student at Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, investigating the link between L1 and L2 proficiency (L1 German and Russian, L2 English). -Dora Beatriz Ramirez, graduate student at the State University of New York at Albany, USA, investigating the L1 attrition of Spanish in the United States -Liefke Reitsma, graduate student at the Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, working on Interference Frisian in the context of the Separate Development Hypothesis. -Lina Weilemar, graduate student at the University of Stockholm, , Sweden, working on attrition within the theoretical frameworks of generative linguistics and psycholinguistics. Participation in the workshop is free. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from NWO and the Faculteit der Letteren, VU Amsterdam. Summary The study of first language attrition is currently entering its third decade. However, after twenty years of diligent investigation resulting in numerous theoretical and empirical papers the questions on this topic still greatly outweigh the answers. Findings from individual studies seem to indicate that it cannot even be said with any certainty whether a first language in which a certain level of proficiency has been reached can ever undergo significant attrition, let alone how or why it might. There are many reasons for this failure to arrive at a more integrated and explanatory framework. Some are theoretical, some methodological, and some are linked to communication or lack thereof between individual researchers. These are the problems that this workshop is trying to address. A further problem is, of course, the extraordinary complexity and multi-facetedness of the phenomenon of language attrition. It is our belief, however, that this last issue cannot even begin to be tackled unless the first three have been solved. It has recently been pointed out to what degree language attrition studies have, in recent years, suffered from the breakdown of the close research network that was present in Europe, specifically in the Netherlands, in the 1980s and early 1990s (Köpke & Schmid, forthc.). Language attrition, which - mainly through the efforts of researchers in the Netherlands - was a very European subject for investigation until the late 1990s, is now fast becoming a topic in which international interest is on the increase, while research within Europe, paradoxically, seems on the decline. Given the increasing interest world-wide in issues of minority languages, ethnicity, migration, and other subjects that have a sociocultural impact that reaches far beyond the confines of linguistics as such, it seems vital to us to put Europe back on the cutting edge of research in this field. In order to do this, this research network has been created with a view of providing support and advice from experienced researchers to graduate students in the field. We hope thus to stimulate the work and improve the quality of the research conducted here. Needless to say, researchers from outside the European Union are more than welcome within the network. With this network we aim at ushering in a new period of first language attrition research. Together we will attempt to develop a unified and crosslinguistically applicable or adaptable blueprint for a research design, while placing strong focus on forging and strengthening links and collaboration through the international research community. Within the project, different modules will investigate specific linguistic and methodological frameworks and theories, such as the regression hypothesis and the cross-linguistic influence hypothesis, on the basis of an investigation of the attrition of various languages in various linguistic settings. By co-ordinating various projects from their incipient stages, we attempt to circumvent the problem that has thus characterized (especially graduate) research on attrition: namely, that everyone setting out to investigate attrition feels compelled to re-invent the wheel. The crosslinguistic approach will make it possible to compare findings from different languages and therefore come to more general conclusions. It will also allow re-assessment of findings from previous studies of language attrition, and provide a framework of research for subsequent studies to adopt. It is hoped that the emphasis which this project places both on standardization of methods and on international cooperation will act as a stimulus that may continue to bring together researchers worldwide, and encourage them to contribute to the development of a more unified framework of research. A first step towards this goal was made in January 2003, when 12 researchers from 5 different European countries gathered at the VU Amsterdam to discuss their projects, all but one of which were in the beginning stages. It was decided to adopt a core elicitation battery, consisting of -a C-test as a relatively formal test assessing overall proficiency -the CITO-interview, which is a semi-structured interview to elicit spontaneous conversation -a questionnaire on language use -a questionnaire on self-assessment/Can-Do scales in L1 and L2 based on the Common European Framework of reference -a re-telling of part of the Charlie Chaplin film "Modern Times", as it was used in the European Science Foundation project on adult language acquisition, and in other language acquisition studies by members of this group since -a matched guise experiment by means of a piece of spoken test in L1 and L2, in order to gauge attitudes towards these two (or more) languages) Progress has since been made on developing these instruments for the languages which are represented in the network, one pilot study (on Dutch in the UK) has been conducted, and further pilot studies will be carried out over the coming months. At the meeting this coming December, these tests will come under further scrutiny, we will compare findings from the pilot studies and discuss possible necessary adaptations to the design which will have to be made before the next phase of data gathering can begin. In later stages of the various projects, we will gather again to discuss further findings as well as their statistical analysis and interpretation. At this stage, we envisage meetings at (roughly) yearly intervals for the coming three to five years.