Editor for this issue: Steve Moran <steve
linguistlist.org>
In (LINGUIST 14.3045), I posted a query about patterns of phonological loanword adaptation involving syllable-final clusters. I was looking for examples of: (1) languages that use two different strategies in adapting CVCC syllables depending on the nature of the consonants in the cluster, and (2) languages that adapt CVCC by epenthesizing into the cluster (--> CV.CvC) when both consonants in the cluster are obstruents. Many thanks to the following people, who sent information about languages, references, or both: Ron Artstein, Elena Bashir, Mike Cahill, Sue Hassel, Shinji Ido, Toby Paff, Marc Picard, Yvan Rose, Gary Toops, Pete Unseth, Adam Ussishkin, Andrew Wedel, and Moira Yip. The following is a brief summary of the responses that I received; please contact me directly if you would like more information or references. - -------- Type (1): Languages with varying repair strategies Marc Picard reports that Canadian French borrows fricative-final clusters unchanged, but resolves ''most other clusters'' with deletion. Andrew Wedel and Shinji Ido sent information on Turkish. Andrew reports that Turkish tolerates some final clusters both in non-loan cases and in loanwords, but resolves illicit clusters with epenthesis into the cluster (CV.CvC). He also mentions some interesting facts about historical changes in patterns of epenthesis in loanword onset clusters. Shinji provides an example of an Arabic CVCC word that is borrowed into Turkish as CV.CvC but is borrowed into Uzbek and Tajik unchanged. Mike Cahill describes Konni (Gur; northern Ghana), which generally only allows nasal codas in the non-loan phonology, and accordingly borrows CVNC as CVN.Cv but other CVCC as CV.Cv.Cv. Adam Ussishkin (reporting on research in collaboration with Dafna Graf) and Ron Artstein sent information about Modern Hebrew. The treatment of clusters here depends on sonority class: two-obstruent clusters and sonorant-obstruent clusters are tolerated; two-sonorant clusters are usually split by epenthesis, although there are individual lexical items that are exceptions; and, Ron notes, obstruent-sonorant clusters are also split by epenthesis. Adam points out that coda clusters (regardless of sonority) are also avoided in the non-loan phonology of Modern Hebrew, except when they are formed by the addition of the 2sg feminine past-tense suffix [-t]. - -------- Type (2): Epenthesis into an obstruent-obstruent cluster Elena Bashir reports that final clusters in Persian loans into Urdu and Panjabi are systematically adapted as CV.CvC for all consonant cluster types (including two-obstruent clusters). Also, there is some variability in the presence of the epenthetic vowel depending on the speaker's educational background, especially in Urdu. - -------- Finally, several respondents sent information about other languages with interesting patterns of loanword-cluster adaptation. Gary Toops sent an example of cluster avoidance only under suffixation, in loanwords in Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian: an English loan cluster is tolerated word-finally in _student_, but split by epenthesis in gen. pl. _studenata_ ''(both _a_ are long)''. Moira Yip sent a paper that discusses a number of patterns involved in loanword adaptation, including a systematic difference in adaptation strategies (V epenthesis vs. C deletion) in two varieties of Mandarin. The paper was published in the Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan (vol 6, no. 1, 2002). Toby Paff suggested looking at English loanwords into Spanish, noting that Spanish essentially avoids coda clusters, and there are a lot of Spanish-speaking communities in the US that could well be using many loanwords from English. Pete Unseth reports that Amharic tolerates certain CC clusters, but resorts to epenthesis when there would otherwise be a large cluster. Yvan Rose has very kindly offered to send me detailed information about French loanwords in Kinyarwanda, which were the subject of his MA thesis from Université Laval. Sue Hassel reports that Tswana (Setswana) resolves most loanword clusters with epenthesis, and that a word-initial CV syllable resulting from this process is sometimes reinterpreted as a noun- class prefix. Thanks again to all who responded. - Jen ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jennifer Smith Department of Linguistics jlsmithMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueunc.edu 322 Dey Hall, CB #3155 http://www.unc.edu/~jlsmith University of North Carolina (919) 962-1474 Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA