Editor for this issue: Marisa Ferrara <marisa
linguistlist.org>
Title: The Intonational Phonology of Direct and Indirect Imperative Sentence Types in Seoul Korean Series Title: LINCOM Studies in Asian Linguistics 48 Publication Year: 2003 Publisher: Lincom Europa http://home.t-online.de/home/LINCOM.EUROPA/ Availability: Available Author: Hyung-Soon Yim Hardback: ISBN: 3895867225, Pages: 144, Price: USD 48 / EUR 46 / GBP 32 Abstract: This book describes and analyses the intonation of two morpho-syntactically equivalent sentence types in Seoul Korean: the so-called direct imperative (or command), and the indirect imperative (or suggestion). The Autosegmental-Metrical theory developed by Pierrehumbert (1980), Beckman and Pierrehumbert (1986), Pierrehumbert and Beckman (1988), and Jun (1996; 1998) is used as analytical framework. Specifically, the book asks if the two sentence types are intonationally distinguishable, and if they are, how they are different. As part of this aim, it also examines how intonational tones are realised over units of different length in the two sentence types, and investigates the intonational phrase structure - the so-called accentual phrase structure - of the two sentence types. The results show that the two sentence types are both similar and different in their intonational structure. They are similar in two ways. Both have the same accentual phrase structure, with two accentual phrases, and both permit of an orthogonal 'strength' dimension. Thus it is claimed that direct imperatives can differ in the authority conveyed, and indirect imperatives can differ in the degree of assertiveness conveyed. It is further claimed that both these orthogonal 'strength' dimensions are signalled by the same phonological mechanism: through the first high tone of the accentual phrase. The two sentence types differ in three ways. They have different boundary tones: /HL%/ or /L%/ in direct imperative and /LHL%/ in indirect imperative, and the relationship between strong authority and weak authority in the direct imperative is categorical, while the relationship between strong assertiveness and weak assertiveness in the indirect imperative is gradient. Also, the indirect imperative has considerably longer duration on the final syllable than the direct imperative. Lingfield(s): Phonology Syntax Subject Language(s): Korean (Language Code: KKN) Written In: English (Language Code: ENG)Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
-------------------------- Major Supporters -------------------------- |
||
| Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd | http://www.continuumbooks.com | |
| John Benjamins | http://www.benjamins.com/ | |
| MIT Press | http://mitpress.mit.edu/ | |
|
---------------------- Other Supporting Publishers ---------------------- |
||
| Evolution Publishing | http://www.evolpub.com | |
| Graduate Linguistic Students' Assoc., Umass | http://server102.hypermart.net/glsa/index.htm | |
| MIT Working Papers in Linguistics | http://web.mit.edu/mitwpl/ | |
| Multilingual Matters | http://www.multilingual-matters.com/ | |
| Pacini Editore Spa | http://www.pacinieditore.it/index_dinamico.htm | |
| SIL International | http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp | |
| St. Jerome Publishing Ltd. | http://www.stjerome.co.uk/ | |