LINGUIST List 14.3469

Mon Dec 15 2003

Qs: Cheyenne Obviate Case

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <foxlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  1. Denise Tugman, Cheyenne Obviate

Message 1: Cheyenne Obviate

Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:01:33 -0700
From: Denise Tugman <dtugmanwyoming.com>
Subject: Cheyenne Obviate

Dear Linguists,

I am conducting a research project on the use of the 4th person in the
Cheyenne Language (obviate), and am trying to tie this language
structure to their culture (4 part distinctions in their culture)
according to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. What role does the obviate
case play in the Cheyenne Language or is it commonly used? Is the
obviate central to the way the language works? Does anyone have any
information on the use of the 4th person in the Cheyenne Language?


Thank you for your help.

 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue