Editor for this issue: Karolina Owczarzak <karolina
linguistlist.org>
New Dissertation Abstract Institution: Georgetown University Program: Department of Linguistics Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 2002 Author: Lisa Russell-Pinson Dissertation Title: Linguistic and Extratextual Variation in Medical English Writings: A comparative genre analysis Linguistic Field: Text/Corpus Linguistics, Discourse Analysis, Applied Linguistics Dissertation Director 1: Jeffrey Connor-Linton Dissertation Director 2: Heidi Hamilton Dissertation Director 3: John Staczek Dissertation Abstract: Adams Smith's (1984) seminal article on author's comment is arguably the genesis of the modern study of Medical English (ME) written discourse. For over a decade, linguists (e.g., Atkinson 1992; Biber and Finegan 2001; Salager-Meyer 1990, 1992, 1994; Webber 1994) have reported on a variety of features in ME research articles. However, comparatively fewer linguistic studies have examined the features present in other ME professional texts, such as review articles, or in ME writings produced for non-specialists, such as ME textbooks and patient information texts. An investigation of three distinctive ME genres was conducted in order to improve the understanding of the frequency and function of the linguistic and extratextual features used in these writings. A corpus of 36 ME texts, totaling over 81,000 words, was constructed; it contained 12 each of the following three genres: medical review articles, medical textbook excerpts and patient information texts. By choosing texts with a primarily informational communicative purpose and by controlling for variables such as topic, date and location of publication and source, audience could be considered as the independent variable. The following dependent variables were examined in the corpus: linguistic features:; nominals; personal pronouns; verb tense/aspect/voice/mood; epistemic markers; relative clauses; sentence type; sentence length; extratextual features: visual information; author information; reference lists; and disclaimers. Frequencies of the linguistic features were measured; then ANOVAs, omega2 tests and post-hoc Tukey tests were conducted to identify significant differences among the three genres. A qualitative approach was used in the examination of the extratextual features. The results from the analysis indicate that the frequencies of certain linguistic and extratextual features vary according to four communicative functions expressed in the ME genres: informational, interactive, organizational and predictive. Furthermore, the same communicative function may be conveyed by different linguistic and extratextual features characteristic to each genre. These findings may benefit medical educators and EMP teachers in instructing prospective and practicing physicians and may be useful to technical writers and health educators in developing effective written materials for patients.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue