Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
Dear Linguists, The following examples show the typical Weak Crossover (WCO) Effects, where the pronoun ''his'' cannot be interpreted as a variable bound by ''who(m)'' (1) a.*?Who(m) do you think that his teacher scolded [t] in yesterday's geology class? (who(m)=his) b.*?Who(m) does his teacher think that Mary scolded [t] in yesterday's geology class? (who(m)=his) But, Mahajan (1992) observes the following contrast in acceptability regarding the WCO effects with Topicalization. In (2b), where the pronoun ''his'' is in the matrix clause, the WCO effects emerge. In (2a), where ''his'' is in the embedded clause, the WCO effects are canceled: (2) a. John, I think that his mother likes [t]. (John=his) b.???John, his mother thinks that Mary likes [t]. (John=his) Then, I'd like to know whether the same contrast can be observed with movement of a wh-phrase of ''which-N'' type (so called ''D-linked'' wh-phrases). Like in (2), is there any contrast whatsoever in acceptability between (3a) and (3b) under the reading ''which student'' = ''his''?: (3) (Among the students in this classroom:) a. Which student do you think that his teacher scolded [t] in yesterday's geology class? (which student=his) b. Which student does his teacher think that Mary scolded [t] in yesterday's geology class? (which student=his) If you find a contrast in (3), can you see the same contrast in (4), where the moved wh-phrase ''which student'' is not the object of a verb, but the object of a preposition. Is there any contrast in acceptability between (4a) and (4b) under the reading ''which student''=''his''?: (4) (Among the students in this classroom:) a. Which student do you think that his teacher will present a special prize to [t] this semester? (which student=his) b. Which student does his classmate think that the teacher will give a special prize to [t] this semester? (which student=his) I'll post a summary if I have enough response. Thanks. Toru Ishii Meiji University, Tokyo, JAPAN Subject-Language: English; Code: ENGMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I am aware of numerous studies on metaphors especially within the sub-field called Philosophy of Language(e.g. Lycan [1999]; Moran [2000]) plus the works of Goodman, Davidson, Searle and Black. However, I am trying to locate linguistic studies on similes of these exist. The only time I have seen similes treated is in relation to metaphors. Does anyone know of any research which deals focuses on similes. I would be most grateful for the assistance.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue