Editor for this issue: Sarah Murray <sarah
linguistlist.org>
Re: 14.3514 >"Key" would be another example of a noun used as an adjective that somehow does not ring true as predicate adjective. Although "The game was fun" works, "The game was key" does not seem to. Although it appears that this is a follow-up comment, and I can't find the original message in the Disc archives, I have noticed what seems to be a new use (and meaning) of 'fun' as a predicate adjective. Consider the following examples: 1. Said by a child while jumping on a trampoline: "This is fun!" 2. Said by an adult to a child as they try a new game: "I told you this would be a fun game." 3. Said sarcastically by an adult while sitting in a traffic jam: "Well this is fun." In the above examples, 'fun' means 'pleasurable/enjoyable' and the referent of 'this' is (or implies) an activity--jumping, playing, and sitting. All of these examples sound perfectly fine to my ears. In the past several years, however, I've heard the following: 1. Said by a saleswoman, as she selected a dress for me to try: "Here's a fun one." 2. Said by my daughter-in-law about a new kind of purse: "Aren't they fun?" 3. Said by an interior designer: "This is a fun look." In the above examples, 'fun' refers not to an activity, but to a thing. And a far as I can tell (having seen the 'things'), it means 'slightly zany; whimsical; not to be taken seriously'. The use of 'fun' in this sense seems to have been coined by the fashion/design/creative industries, and limited to this arena. It also seems to be a national phenomenon, as I heard #3 on a TV show. Re: 14.3579 Ellen Valle asks if 'funnest' is becoming common in American English-- I deliberately use 'funnest' every once in a while with my students (ages 4-18) just to see what the reaction is. The youngest ones accept it without even noticing, but the older ones--maybe 9 and above--always correct me with something like, "Uh, I don't think 'funnest' is a word." Fun topic. ~Karen MilliganMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Just a couple of data contributions on "key" and "winningest": "Anna" (Sikozu Johnson <sikozujohnsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecox.net>) suggests, for "key" as a predicate, that "As with most speech patterns, it is common among the youthful-ish..." Well, maybe, but it's certainly not just used by the young. At a book group last night I caught the presenter using this construction twice in the course of a short book review (it sounds natural enough to me that I'm sure I wouldn't have noticed if not for this thread) -- one instance was "This scene is key;" the other was longer, so I didn't write it down word for word, but along the lines of "Knowing the father's background is key if you want to understand why the family later falls apart." We're a pretty stodgy and middle-aged group; the presenter was at least 45. On "X is the winningest coach in the NBA," "the highway-walkingest man this world can ever see," etc. -- Just in the last year or so I've noticed lots of my students using "awesomest" in writing as well as in speech, but no one ever seems to say "awesomer". These superlatives DO sound odd to me (unlike "key") and "awesomest" at least does seem limited to the under-25 crowd. Catherine Rudin http://www.wsc.edu/schools/ahu/faculty_staff/ca_rudin/