LINGUIST List 15.1079

Thu Apr 1 2004

Qs: Participle Fronting; Chinese/Urdu Dictionary

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <foxlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  1. Luis Vicente, typology of participle fronting
  2. Velva Fallin, Chinese-Urdu Dictionary

Message 1: typology of participle fronting

Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:51:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Luis Vicente <l.vicentelet.leidenuniv.nl>
Subject: typology of participle fronting

Dear all,

I'm looking for languages that allow for Verb Auxiliary orders of the
type of Dutch, German, SerboCroatian, Bulgarian... That is, Verb
Auxiliary orders that aren't base generated like that (i.e., in a left
branching structure), but have been usually attributed to leftward
movement of the verb over the auxiliary (either as long head movement,
remnant VP movement...). E.g., in Dutch

Gezien_i heb ik Jan t_i
seen have I Jan

It would be wonderful if your replies include example sentences of the
particular language.

A summary will be posted in due time.

Cheers

Luis Vicente
Leiden Centre for Linguistics
P.O. Box 9515
2300 RA Leiden
Netherlands 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Message 2: Chinese-Urdu Dictionary

Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:36:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Velva Fallin <auntvelvahotmail.com>
Subject: Chinese-Urdu Dictionary

Does a Chinese-Urdu dictionary exist, and how may I obtain one?
Simplified Chinese would be best, but certainly a Traditional Chinese
one would be better than none.

Thank you. 

Subject-Language: Chinese, Mandarin;Urdu; Code: URD 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue