Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
Dear Linguists, My general topic of research has been the question of whether it could be possible to extend the notion of lenition (generally regarded to be capturable in terms of melodic loss) to melodic 'gain'. In other words, whereas a change of the d > t type is generally regarded to exemplify the loss of melodic material, here 'voice', for example, what label (from this perspective) could be given to a t going to d in intervocalic positions, for example? If one regards lenition to be loss of material, is this fortition then? If this should be fortition, what label could be attached then to the following changes t > ?, j > dz, s > th, etc. Should one make a difference (and how) between melodic loss/gain vs. sonority hierarchy vs. structural position of the change (intervocalic, etc.)? SO, can lenition be loss and gain at the same time? Is there any explicit literature (of any conviction) on this subject? (I would be exceedingly grateful for any hints on this!).Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Dear colleagues, I deal with comparing the sound pictures of world languages. I have studied so far 156 world languages from the point of view of occurrence of phonemes in their sound chains. I guess it can be called the typological study. This is why, I'm particularly interested how linguists and other scholars understand typology. Can one call my study the "comparative typology"? What is typology as it is? Looking forward to hearing from you soon to yutambMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehotmail.com Remain yours most sincerely Yuri Tambovtsev yutamb
hotmail.com20