Editor for this issue: Naomi Ogasawara <naomi
linguistlist.org>
QDA Miner, Provalis Research. Elmar Henning North-West University South Africa [This is a review of the software package announced in http://linguistlist.org/issues/15/15-911.html which complements the previously posted review of WordStat in http://linguistlist.org/issues/15/15-1171.html --Eds.] QDA Miner is an analysis tool for analysing textual data from a qualitative perspective with a number of useful features for linguistics research such as tagging or encoding texts, performing annotation, and performing assorted retrievals according to set specifications. The QDA Miner incorporates a large selection of tools to find patterns in texts between so called metadata or inserted codes or annotations. A wide range of text formats are supported anything from plain text files to dBase files. When combined with sister applications WordStat and SimStat it provides integration of qualitative and quantitative content analysis methods. During my review of the QDA Miner, I was very impressed by the vast number of possible text project uses for this application. QDA Miner is one of, if not the best multi-use text application that I have ever worked with. It is relatively easy to use, but at the same time one has to know what one is doing to get sensible and above all useful results out of it. During my review, I worked through the Demo project included in the evaluation edition just to find my feet and to get an idea as to what the QDA Miner can do. As I come from a database background and work alongside linguists and their research data on a daily basis, I tested the QDA Miner by creating a dummy corpus project by using the data that had been gathered for use in one of the Corpus Linguistic Research projects running at the North-West University. I found that the QDA Miner was most useful indeed. And indeed provides some unique and very useful functions that prove very useful for linguistic research. The extreme flexibility of the QDA Miner makes it a contender for consideration for a virtually limitless range of text projects. The analysis features of the QDA Miner are very useful for text analysis. In the Dummy Corpus project for instance, I used the variables as metadata definitions to run searches through imported data with, I must add, surprising ease. The coding of the texts is equally simple, fist you define you code and then drag and drop it in the appropriate place. There are no forced codes and one is left to one's own devices. I especially like the double click feature for code insertion and the colour coding of each defined code, these colours makes the distinguishing between the various codes easy. Another great feature of the QDA Miner is its ability to import virtually any type of file under the import document feature. Although one has extensive freedom with variables, codes and potential imports, the analysis features of the QDA Miner makes analyzing texts in various ways very easy. However there are some less than pleasing, what can be called niggles present in the QDA Miner. Its date format is weird for one, and the limit on the variable length can be bothersome. But this doesn't detract from the usefulness of the QDA Miner. One learns to give short but meaningful names to variables, and one does eventually get used to the weird date format. The nice thing about the QDA Miner from my point of view is the fact that one has virtually unlimited freedom when defining variables, as there are no fixed or required variables. QDA Miner Provides great coverage for general text analysis, but unfortunately is a bit lacking in some areas. For example: the when coding a text document it would be nice to be able to annotate individual words in the text itself not only alongside the text. When one performs word class tagging or annotation the display with the coding information becomes rather clustered. But then again, not everyone is going to use the QDA Miner for word class tagging. The QDA Miner is extremely useful due to the fact that it incorporates some functions and features that are rather unique. It removes the necessity to use multiple research tools because it includes most of the best and most frequently used tools such as Metadata searches, encoding functions etc. When it comes to usability, the QDA Miner is second to none. There are multiple ways to access the same functions, multiple access points for each component such as cases, codes, variables etc. Each case, code or variable can be accessed via a menu that wraps only the functionality attached to the specific function under scrutiny. In short the QDA Miner caters for both beginners and advanced users. The basic interface and work environment is easy to understand and presents all the basic functions with easy access. There is also a fairly comprehensive help function and the Demo project is invaluable to the first time user. This coupled with the PDF manual and you are ready to go out and use the QDA Miner to its fullest extent. The QDA Miner provides a good coverage of the most popular and required functions in a text analysis tool. Provision has been made for sister applications like WordStat and Simstat plug-ins to increase coverage of more specialized functions. A feature that is lacking in my opinion is the ability to physically code the text in the text window, at the moment the text can only coded in the code window alongside the text window. But that apart, the tool is of high quality and is overall highly functional and will become an invaluable text analysis tool in future. There are unique menus for each component to modify option unique to that specific function and thus giving the user the option of customizing each component in the desired fashion. By giving each component its own menu and shortcuts, the applications become easy to use and understand. One the whole, I am very impressed with the functionality provided by the application, it has a wide variety functions to cater for a wide range of text implementations. To tell the truth, the QDA Miner can be used for virtually any text driven project to perform a wide range of analyses. ABOUT THE REVIEWER Elmar Henning is currently the manager of the Language Technology Laboratory at the North-West University, South Africa. He is currently working on his Masters degree in the combination fields of Computer Science and Corpus Research, where he is currently involved in the development of custom made research tools for Corpus research material management, data retrieval and annotation.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue