LINGUIST List 15.1624

Sun May 23 2004

Qs: Non-Literal Use of Motion Verbs

Editor for this issue: Steve Moran <stevelinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  1. Stathis Selimis, non-literal use of Motion Vs

Message 1: non-literal use of Motion Vs

Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 03:15:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stathis Selimis <sselimisyahoo.gr>
Subject: non-literal use of Motion Vs

I am investigating non-literal, including clearly metaphorical, uses
of Motion Verbs in early child-adult interaction in Greek and English
(both as L1). Could you send me any recent references and/or papers
on metaphor and akin phenomena (e.g. fictive motion) in child language
compatible with the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor? I am already aware
of two relevant dissertations: C.R. Johnson (1999) and S. Ozcaliskan
(2002).

I will post a summary of responses.

Thanks.
Stathis Selimis, 
Ph.D. candidate
sselimisyahoo.gr 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue