Editor for this issue: Takako Matsui <tako
linguistlist.org>
Institution: University of Nottingham Program: School of English Studies Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 2003 Author: Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis Dissertation Title: Requesting Strategies and Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Greek and English Linguistic Field: Pragmatics Subject Language: English (code: ENG), Greek(code: GRK) Dissertation Director 1: Prof. Ronald Carter Dissertation Abstract: The stimulus for this study derives from the observation that, despite their advanced language proficiency, Greek learners of English, similarly to other non-native speakers, employ requests in such a way that they often violate social appropriateness in the target culture. This study tests and confirms the hypothesis that Greek learners' requests reveal a significant trend for a higher degree of requestive directness, as compared to British English native speakers' requests. UK university/college students (Greek and British) were the target population. The main research instrument was a discourse-completion questionnaire. In addition, telephone observation data was gathered and interviews were carried out. The study examined two possible interrelated causes, which may be responsible for the learners' requestive deviation: the possible pragmatic transfer from their native language and culture, and possible differences between the learners and the native speakers in their perception and assessment of social reality. Results suggested evidence of strong sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic transfer. It is argued that the requestive deviation on the part of the learners is consistent with the ethos of directness, spontaneity and positive politeness orientation found to characterise the Greek society and language. At the same time, the study indicated that there are significant cross-cultural differences between the Greek learners and the English native speakers in the relative weight of familiarity, social power and imposition in the majority of the social situations tested. It is maintained that differences in the subjects' situational assessment can be linked to differences in the subjects' linguistic choices.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue