Editor for this issue: Steve Moran <steve
linguistlist.org>
In Science magazine of January 16, 2004, there is an interesting article by Fitch and Hauser entitled "Computatational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate". The authors describe an experiment that they characterize as showing that sotton-top tamarins "can master" finite state grammars, but "were unable to master a grammar at [the] 'phrase structure grammar' level." In http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000355.html, I review the details of their experiment, and conclude that they have over-interpreted its results, and that there is a plausible alternative account in terms of memory span and/or sensitivity to statistical deviations, making no (implicit or explicit) reference to classes of grammars. The experimental paradigm is very promising, and the experiment itself is interesting, but the very sweeping interpretation given to the results is not warranted, and is likely to mislead people who don't look carefully at how the experiment actually worked.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue