LINGUIST List 15.2330

Wed Aug 18 2004

Qs: Evaluating the Cognitive Approach to Metaphor

Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer <sawyerlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  1. Imogen Osborn, Evaluating the cognitive approach to metaphor
  2. Nooshin Vaziri, Q. English for students of computer science

Message 1: Evaluating the cognitive approach to metaphor

Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:28:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Imogen Osborn <ieo20cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Evaluating the cognitive approach to metaphor

I am a student currently preparing a dissertation on metaphor for one
of my final-year undergrad papers. I am particularly interested in the
cognitive approach. I understand one of Lakoff & Johnson's views to be
that our early physical experiences shape how we think about the world
and so lead to the development of the metaphors we think in. For
example, a child associates hugs from a parent with love, and this
leads to the physical sensation of warmth, so therefore the child
associates love with warmth, leading to metaphors such as 'a warm
personality'. Also my understanding is that Lakoff & Johnson say that
everyone has the early experiences necessary to form these thought
structures, hence why we use the same metaphors. 

However, I have two questions. Firstly, would it not be possible to
find certain people whose early experiences were abnormal, for example
due to disability, maternal deprivation, being abandoned or isolated
to the extreme in childhood, and so on, such that they did not have
those necessary early experiences on the basis of which to form the
metaphors in which most people think? 

Secondly, has any research been carried out into this area - do Lakoff
& Johnson say anything on whether these kinds of experiences do seem
to affect people's use of metaphor? 

Has anyone looked in to these cases? (I can't think I'd be the first 
person to think of that kind of thing but I haven't found any 
literature about that - or maybe it's a silly idea.)

Imogen Osborn






Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Message 2: Q. English for students of computer science

Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:45:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nooshin Vaziri <noosh_vtyahoo.com>
Subject: Q. English for students of computer science

Dear linguists,

I'm a PhD student of TESOL at Esfahan Azad university
of Iran. For a survey concerning English for Specific 
Purposes, I need an up-to-date inventory of criteria for 
selecting and analysing ESP books for students of 
computer sciences. I'm particularly interested in the 
global professional and academic needs of such 
university students. 

If you've got ANY clues or comments, please write to me 
at noosh_vtyahoo.com. I'll post a summary to the list
later.

Regards,

Nooshin Vaziri 

 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue