Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox
linguistlist.org>
Many readers of this list may have seen today's CNN report on the Science article which was published yesterday on Piraha (http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/08/19/science.counting.reut/index.html). The Science article reports on research carried out by Peter Gordon, along with me and my wife, Keren, several years ago to test my view that Piraha had no counting. Gordon confirmed that indeed Pirahas have no concept of counting and further refined my original ideas on the matter. Gordon's conclusion in Science is that Piraha offers support for the Whorf hypothesis. While I believe that this is plausible, my own view is that the lack of counting must be seen in the larger cultural context and that when thus viewed in conjunction with the lack of color words, the lack of embedding, the simplest kinship system ever documented, and various other characteristics, a different, non-Whorfian picture emerges. The basic conclusion I reach is that culture constrains grammar in ways many of us have not previously imagined. I take this to be an argument against, for example, Universal Grammar, at least the more widely-accepted versions of it. Anyone interested in reading on this further (and the Piraha case does seem to be getting a lot of attention from various countries, based on my email folder this morning), my paper "Cultural Constraints on Grammar in Piraha", currently under review, is available from my University of Manchester website: at http://ling.man.ac.uk/info/staff/DE/DEHome.html - Dan EverettMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue