Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer <sawyer
linguistlist.org>
Dear colleagues, Does anybody know of languages with the following characteristics: a) No verbal markers for finiteness, tense, person, number etc on lexical verbs b) Overt movement of lexical verbs into the functional/IP domain (or to C) in at least some context. eg. It is possible that some languages may only exhibit verb movement in the past tense etc (cf Baker and Stewart, 1998 on Edo). One such language is Afrikaans which exhibits verb-second behaviour but has no verbal morphology to speak of on lexical verbs (modals and auxiliaries have suppletive variants). `Tensed' lexical verbs are thus identical to their `infintival' counterparts. I'm working on Afrikaans verb movement at the moment and would very much like to compare it to other languages with similar properties. The problem is that languages with these two properties seem to be particularly rare. I have asked some Dutch creolists who say that other Dutch creoles don't have observable verb movement. The particular phenomenon I am looking at is the `complex initial' in Afrikaans, where there appear to be more than one verb in the second position of a verb-second clause. 1) a. Daar [laat] hy die kop val there let he the cup fall `There he goes and drops the cup' b. Daar [laat val] hy die kop there let fall he the cup `There he goes and drops the cup' Since this type of construction is unique to Afrikaans among the Germanic languages, and Afrikaans is also the only one of these languages that completely lacks any kind of verbal marking, it makes sense to see if there is a link between these. This is why I'd like to see what other languages with these properties are capable of. Needless to say, a summary of the results of this query will be posted to the list. regards Mark (de Vos)Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue