Editor for this issue: Sarah Murray <sarah
linguistlist.org>
At the recent LSA convention I attended the symposium: Endangered Data vs Enduring Practice which addressed techniques and methods for archiving and disseminating digital linguistic data. One of the presenters--Doug Whalen of Haskins Laboratories--spoke several times to the importance of this kind of work and the fact that most of it does not fit into traditional definitions of tenure-able scholarship for most institutions. Some of this lag is attributable to the major changes in the medium of research, but in any case, there appears an evident and clear need for dialogue to educate our institutions on the importance and scholastic validity of this kind of research. Does anyone have any experience with fieldwork / data archiving vis-�-vis tenure that would help inform this? A good starting point for dialogue is: Whalen, D.H. (Forthcoming). How the study of endangered languages will revolutionize linguistics. To appear in Sterkenburg, P. van. (Ed.). Linguistics Today. John Benjamins: Amsterdam -Don SaltingMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue