Editor for this issue: Takako Matsui <tako
linguistlist.org>
Institution: Cornell University Program: Human Development Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 1999 Author: Shamitha Somashekar Dissertation Title: DEVELOPMENTAL TRENDS IN THE ACQUISITION OF RELATIVE CLAUSES: CROSS-LINGUISTIC EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF TULU Linguistic Field: Psycholinguistics, Syntax, Cognitive Science, Language Acquisition Subject Language: Tulu (code: TCY) Dissertation Director 1: Barbara Lust Dissertation Director 2: James Gair Dissertation Director 3: Claire Cardie Dissertation Abstract: Conflicting theories exist on the fundamental nature of processes involved in first language acquisition. Some claim that children induce specific-language-grammar (SLG) from input-data using principles operating directly on data. Others argue that children, guided by abstract principles and parameters provided by Universal Grammar (UG) construct SLG using actual data only indirectly. This dissertation examines these claims from a cross-linguistic perpective, studying relative clause (RC) structure and acquisition in Tulu, a left-branching, Dravidian, SOV (Subject-Object-Verb) language, in the light of previous acquisition studies in other languages. After various forms of Tulu RCs were grammatically analyzed, production of four kinds of RCs was tested in two experiments with 60 children from Mangalore, India, (age range: 2 yrs; 5 months to 6 yrs; 6 months, mean 4 yrs; 3 months), using controlled experimental design. We varied overtness of relative operator, and form of RC verb (fully-inflected canonical verb, or one lacking certain inflection-features). We also varied whether the RC was gapped or not, was adjacent to its head or not, and was in canonical-SOV form or not. The design allowed contrast of relatively 'data-transparent' structures to 'grammar-transparent' structures, i.e., most accessible to certain UG principles. Specifically, the design ay"lowed analysis of knowledge of inflection, and capacity to integrate infle�tion components required for particular RC forms. Results reveal that (1) Less data-transparent structures were most accessible in RC development. (2) Children provided grammatically correct analysis of inflection-features, integrating them according to RC structure produced. (3) Cross-linguistic analyses showed first language acquisition of certain Tulu-RC structures remarkably in advance of development of English and French lexically-headed restrictive relatives tested previously. These results argue that children in first language acquisition do not merely operate on surface-data inductively, but are guided by grammatical principles which may be universal, in their hypotheses about particular constructions in a language, to construct SLG. Evidence supports not "data-transparency" but "grammar-transparency", not "data-mapping" (from surface-data to SLG) but "grammar-mapping" (to SLG from universally available grammatical principles). Theoretically, results provide specific evidence that children in the "initial-state" integrate knowledge of CP with language-specific aspects of DP and "WH" in acquisition of relativization.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue