LINGUIST List 15.667

Sun Feb 22 2004

Qs: Vowel Changes; Vocative Case/DPs

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <foxlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  1. Hugues Steve N.-Koumba-Binza, Vowel change
  2. James T. Myers, vocative case and DPs

Message 1: Vowel change

Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:08:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Hugues Steve N.-Koumba-Binza <hugues_steveyahoo.fr>
Subject: Vowel change

Dear Linguists,

I am working on Civili (Bantu, H12) vowel system. Previous authors
claimed a phenomenon of semivocalization or glide formation in words
such as (orthographically written) mwiifi ''thief'' or lyeesu
''eye''. But spectograms show a kind of sequencing of [ui] for the
first word and [ie] for the second. I wonder how to name such
phenomenon. I see it as a vowel change similar to diphtong, but shall
I name it as such? Please, any idea with references in other languages
let me know. Sincerely,

Steve 

Subject-Language: Civili; Code: VIF 
Language-Family: Niger-Congo; Code: NC 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Message 2: vocative case and DPs

Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:44:45 +0800 (CST)
From: James T. Myers <lngmyersccunix.ccu.edu.tw>
Subject: vocative case and DPs


I'm mildly curious about formal analyses of the internal structure of
vocatives, but there seems to be very little research on this.

Two specific (probably unrelated) questions. First, given its role as a
discourse element that couldn't possibly be more adjunctish, how (and more
importantly why) does the vocative get case (overtly marked in more than
one language family)? Second, if proper names and "the" phrases are both
DPs, why can only the former be used in the vocative (again, in more than
one language)? E.g. if you want the Thing to pass you the salt, you'd
say "Hey, Thing, pass me the salt", not *"Hey, the Thing, pass me the
salt."

James Myers
Graduate Institute of Linguistics
National Chung Cheng University
Min-Hsiung, Chia-Yi 621
TAIWAN
Lngmyers at ccu dot edu dot tw
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue