Editor for this issue: Anne Clarke <anne
linguistlist.org>
The North West Centre for Linguistics is delighted to announce The 2004 Annual Lecture Arts Building, University of Manchester, UK. Monday 29 March 2004, 5.30pm Professor Penelope Eckert, Stanford University, CA. ''The Stylistic Turn: Getting serious about the social meaning of variation'' ALL WELCOME Abstract Sociolinguistic variation is a central means by which the social is embedded in language. And while traditional approaches to variation acknowledge social meaning, they give precedence to the grammatical system at the expense of the system of social meaning. This talk will explore an alternate approach to variation, which focuses on personal styles as the interpretive basis for individual variables. Analytic practice in the study of sociolinguistic variation has grown primarily out of a concern with the linguistic and social constraints on linguistic change. Variables have been selected for study by virtue of their integration into grammar and change - e.g. in the case of phonological variables, their status as components of regional vowel shifts. The focus on large-scale correlations of variables with abstract categories such as age, gender and class has uncovered critical patterns in the spread of change through large populations, but has led linguists to treat variables as direct markers of these categories. Meanwhile, studies of variation in small communities (Labov 1972; Holmquist 1985; Wolfram and Schilling-Estes 1995; Mendoza-Denton 1999; Eckert 2000) have called upon ethnographic methods to uncover the local dynamics of variable use in day-to-day social practice. Out of this work has come a focus on the finer, more local, meanings that come to be associated with variables. In these studies, it has become clear that linguistic variables generally index social categories indirectly, and that correlations with gender, class, etc. result from the patterned evocation of social meanings such as toughness, gentility, conciseness, anger, childishness, casualness, etc. Social meaning, then, is not to be found in a particular component of the grammar, or in changes in progress, but in a semiotic system that calls on resources from various parts of the linguistic system (and beyond). Social meaning resides not in individual variables but in styles. Speakers combine semiotic resources to construct personae, and individual variables contribute to this construction. A focused study of social meaning, therefore, must take as its point of departure not individual variables but styles. The Lecture will be followed by a wine party, hosted by the NWCL. If you have any questions, see http://www.nwcl.salford.ac.uk or email k.d.watsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelancaster.ac.uk.