Editor for this issue: Steve Moran <steve
linguistlist.org>
Hello, My name is Arik Drezner and I am developing dictionary software. I am looking for a bilingual dictionary databases (in text file). I have a number of questions: 1. Where can I find such a database (if you don't have it)? 2. How much it will cost? I will appreciate if you could fill up the following table. 3. Is there additional fees or royalties for distributing the database in my software? Database Number of words Price ($) English -> Dutch Dutch -> English English -> French French -> English English <-> German English <-> Hebrew English <-> Italian English <-> Russian English <-> Spanish English <-> Portuguese English <-> Japanese English <-> Korean English <-> Chinese Best regards Arik Drezner R&d engineer E-mail: arik200Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuebezeqint.net
Dear colleagues, I'm looking for more information on the placement of enclitic possessive pronouns in Modern Greek (MG). I would be grateful for any references to published work or input from personal knowledge. The phenomenon in which I am interested is the following. Sadock (1991: 71-72) mentions that MG possessive pronoun enclitics can either be placed at the end of the NP (1a), or on the immediate preverbal word (1b) but not elsewhere (1c). 1a) a-filos-mu the-friend-my 1b) o-kalos-mu filos the-dear-my friend 1c) *o-kalos-mu palyos filos the-dear-my old friend Halpern (1995: 35-36) finds that sentences like (1c) are not completely ungrammatical to all speakers, and further notes the possibility to have multiple possessive enclitics (2). 2) to-mikro-mu palo-mu spiti the-little-my old-my house In a basic description of MG, Mackridge (1987: 222) notes in passing that the possessive pronoun enclitic, while normally final in the NP, 'may also follow an adjective or other premodifiers ... when the pronoun really qualifies the noun modified by the premodifier.' He claims there to be a difference in meaning between the pre-nominal enclitic (3a) and the post-nominal enclitic (3b), in that the possible meaning of (3b) are more restricted. 3a) to palio mas autokineto the old our car 'our car, which happens to be old' 'our previous car' 3b) to palio autokineto mas the old car our 'our previous car' My questions are: - What are the possible placement of the possessive enclitics in MG? - Do all different person/number enclitics behave the same? - Is there any consice investigation into the possibilities of the placement of the possessive enclitic in MG, preferably with corpus data? - Is the immediate preverbal word really the preferred host, as claimed by Sadock? - Is there any difference in meaning, as claimed by Mackridge? - Is there any dialectal/idiolectal variation, as claimed by Halpern? Thanks in advance for any help Michael Cysouw ZAS BerlinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue