LINGUIST List 16.1248|
Tue Apr 19 2005
Qs: Poll About Proverbs; Higgenbotham's Linking Theory
Editor for this issue: Jessica Boynton
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Poll About Proverbs
On Higgenbotham's Linking Theory
Message 1: Poll About Proverbs
From: Britta Juska-Bacher <Britta.Juska-Bacheraccess.unizh.ch>
Subject: Poll About Proverbs
I work at the University of Zurich (Switzerland) on a research project
about proverbs and idioms. With the help of a questionnaire I investigate
in different languages (Dutch, German, Swedish and English) which 16th
century proverbs are still known and which are still in use. The
questionnaire is based on the famous painting by Pieter Bruegel the elder,
the Netherlandish proverbs (1559).
In Dutch, German and Swedish speaking countries numerous people showed
their interest in this research project by participating in the poll
(during the first four weeks I received more than 700 filled-in
questionnaires). I am now looking for native English speakers who want to
participate in the poll.
You can find the questionnaire at
I would also be very grateful if you could forward the link to other people
who you think might be interested.
Thanks a lot for your help!
Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics
Subject Language(s): Dutch (DUT)
German, Standard (GER)
Message 2: On Higgenbotham's Linking Theory
From: Tony Marmo <antonio_marmoEXCITE.COM>
Subject: On Higgenbotham's Linking Theory
The occurence and the behaviour of co-referential nominals in sentences,
under the labels of binding and control, have been classically treated as
mainly syntactic phenomena, where the syntactic structure was licensed by
teleological co-indexation considerations.
Binding and Control theories are the oldest and most resilient component
of Generative thought that has survived to present day. The basic
assumptions and core concepts of Classical Binding and Control theory have
their origins in Langacker (1966), Rosenbaun (1967), Postal (1970),
Jackendoff (1972) (Chapters 4 and 5), Chomsky (1973) and Lasnik (1976),
who had tackled most of the main issues from a transformational
perspective. Thereafter, this conceptual Binding theoretic nucleus has
been re-formulated based on the theoretic refinement and enlargement of
the application of Langacker's (1966) notion of command in Reinhart (1976)
and Chomsky (1980, 1981 and 1982), together and in parallel with Bresnam
(1982) and Manzini (1983). The format of Binding theory has remained
almost unaltered since that time. Later proposals of reformulation, such
as Reinhart and Reuland (1993), Reinhart (1999, 2000), Heim (2004) etc,
have kept the essence of the model virtually intact.
One alternative that I consider at least captivating is Higginbotham's
(1983) Linking theory. But, as far as I know, it has not been used by many.
If anyone reading this post works with James Higginbotham's linking
theory, please let me know about it. Thanks!
Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.